Since this thread has spawned misunderstandings and definition wars, I have narrowed the scope just a bit. I only want blind faith to be discussed here.
I am of the opinion that blind faith, especially if it contradicts what I already know to be true through gathered information and personal observation, is useless and should be avoided.
If you mean should anyone feel as if they must believe something they disagree with, then the answer is no, one should never be forced to accept a belief that does not seem credible.
I think you (and folks in the other thread) are applying your own biases and framing the question in a way that does not contribute to any sort of discussion about anything (which is perhaps what Shodan is implying).
Yes, I agree with your OP. I think that most people of ‘faith,’ and even of ‘blind faith,’ don’t in fact think that their beliefs contradict what they know to be true based on personal observation. Their beliefs contradict what Czarcasm believes to be true.
I don’t know that this will spawn much of a debate, but I’ve been wrong before. I’m not sure how anyone would defend having faith in something that is unsupported by their own “gathered information and personal observation.”
To address the question in the OP directly, no I don’t find blind faith as you describe it admirable. I also don’t think I know anyone (or if I do, it’s an incredibly small subset of people I know) who has that sort of faith, even the religious people I know.
If someone has a problem with my definition of blind faith just come out and say so, but only if you are willing to give what you think to be the correct definition. I don’t care to discuss all the different types of faith being bandied about in the other thread, so please don’t bring them up.
I’m not playing any “win/lose” game here. The term “blind faith” isn’t one invented by atheists to harass religionists-it is a term used by some of the religious as something to be sought after and cherished, and I’d like to know why. What is good about blind faith? What is bad about blind faith?
To clarify, though, I don’t think there is an appreciable difference between ‘faith’ and ‘blind faith’.
To quote my (made-up-on-the-spot) definition of faith from the other thread:
I find that a pretty compelling definition, that holds true regardless of the criteria one uses upon which to base that faith.
Again, I think that almost no human being holds beliefs in the way you describe them in the OP. I think that people who use “blind faith” to describe themselves use it as a superlative, and not as a delineation between faith and something different.
You’re certainly mistaken, suffering from confirmation bias or mentally glossing over issues. Prayer doesn’t work and I’m assuming you haven’t stumbled across actual *evidence *for the divine. Especially the particular brand of the divine you believe in, that happens to have a branch near your house.
On topic: This brings up a good point. Through things like confirmation bias, people can *think *they have good reasons to believe something. So they have a blind faith, but they imagine it isn’t.
In some cases having a belief can make your life easier. I’m sure if you have a child dying for instance, it is comforting to believe he will float off to God and live happy forever. In that instance facing reality might make that person’s life worse. So their blind faith would be useful to that extent.
But in the long run, living without regard for reality is, I would suggest, a net drag.
Admirable is a value judgement. Not sure what you mean by admirable. Having said that, Blind Faith is silly and idiotic. I haven’t met anyone who professes blind faith in anything. But then again I haven’t met most of the people on this planet, so take it for what it’s worth.