[QUOTE=Susanann]
Its just different, it just has different “demographics”, as it should, from other cities.
Detroit is not full of French-americans, so Detroit is not like Paris,
it doesnt have any cowboys so it doesn’t look like Jackson Hole Wyoming.
it doesnt have any farmers, so it doesnt look like Fargo North Dakota,
It is not Nashville so you wont find any country bars nor hoedowns in Detroit,
it is not Las Vegas so you wont find any nightclubs nor big name entertainers,
it doesnt have any Irish, Germans, Polish, Swiss, English, Scottish, or Ukranians either.
Detroit is mostly, almost entirely, an African-American and Arab-American city.
If you dont like African-American/Arab-American cities, then just dont visit it, but I dont see anything intrinsically “wrong” with Detroit.
[/QUOTE]
You don’t see anything broken about a city that’s lost half its population, most of its jobs, and by the way, most of its ethnicities? Detroit used to be full-to-bursting with Poles, Germans, Jews, Slavs and Balts of every flavor, Anglo-Scots-Irish from Appalachia, and some groups you might not think of, such as Armenians and Filipinos. In the eighties, I went to school in the northern suburbs with people named Manoogian, Blanco, Nagy, Afif, Catallo, Knudsen, Piotrowski, Waisanen, Rabinowitz, Van Dam, Kambouris, Breitmeyer, Filipovic, Shorter, Koltys, Weaver, and Murphy - all of them at least second-generation and sometimes longer in greater Detroit. Go back to 1940 or 1950 and you’d likely have found those names in the phone book in Detroit proper. It was one of those cities—Bridgeport was another one—where the ideal of the “melting pot” actually seemed to have some relevance.