Exhibit “A” - At the IMDb the techinical specs for “Robin Hood” (1973) give the aspect ratio for the film as 1.75 : 1
Exhibit “B” - At the IMDb the DVD details for “Robin Hood” (1973) gives the aspect ratio as 1.33 : 1: and calls it “Pan & Scan.”
Exhibit “C” - At Amazon.com the aspect ratio is given as 1.33:1 and it is called "Full Screen (Standard).
Exhibit “D” -
So people of the jury, is the quote in Exhibit “D” a flasehood?
Incidently I came upon this while investigating “The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh” which has a 1.33:1 aspect ration on their 25th Anniversary Edition but no claim to be presented in its original theatrical aspect ratio which has a 1.75:1 aspect ratio in it’s IMDb techinical specs. Now “The Aristocats”, that has the exact same claim and problem as well. However the IMDb says that “101 Dalmations” had a 1.75:1 intended aspect ratio. Alright I’m done investigating. What’s the straight dope?
Many of Disney’s movies from that era were deliberately framed for both tv and theatrical presentation. They’d be filmed or animated at 1.37:1, hard matted to about 1.75 for theatrical presentation, then shown, very quickly thereafter, on “The Wonderful World of Disney” at 1.33:1.
So the answer is that both 1.33 and 1.75 are correct. The 1.33:1 is full screen, but isn’t pan ‘n’ scan. The correct term is “open matte”, which usually refers to showing material at the top and bottom of a 35mm frame not intended to be seen by the audience in the theater. In this case, the material revealed by removing the mattes was intended to be seen by the tv audience, having been produced with tv’s in mind in the first place.