Is this a rhetorical question? Because, if not, I choose Van Jones. As should anyone.
What Cabinet position did Jones hold?
The Folks of Metairie and surrounding Counties thought otherwise and sent him to Congress where he served his term , Van Jones was booted from the Obama Administration …
Aside from the fact that you don’t appear to know what a cabinet member is, you appear to think being a socialist is as bad as being a white supremacist fucktard. Is that accurate?
Van Jones was Socialist fucktard & a member of the Obama regime who was ousted , David Duke was an elected Congressman who served out his entire term in congress .
David Duke was never a US Congressman.
Now I see how my posts (Twaddle) must seem to you folks .
Can’t tell if you’re admitting you’re wrong (Duke was, shamefully, elected to the Louisiana State House of Representatives for a single term, but never to the US Congress) or if you’re doubling down.
Van Jones is not a socialist, and as a Yale Law grad is not a “fucktard” and there is no such thing as the Obama regime, and he resigned and thus was not ousted. David Duke was never elected to Congress, and therefore didn’t serve his entire term.
A single sentence manages to have six errors in it.
At this point I’m wondering who Donpeyote considers to be to his right politically, because at the moment the list appears to be limited to Attila the Hun and Darkseid.
Meanwhile, for Calico Jack’s benefit, a monologue about FoxNews’ differentiation between “news” and “opinion” by that nice Mr Stewart.
Clear?
Yeah, but aside from all that, it’s a good argument!
The monthly jobs report came out today and it was better than expected. Over 200K jobs added, although the unemployment rate ticked up. 01%. In the past, Fox has criticized similar numbers as not being as good as they appeared. But today they thought the “first jobs report of the Trump administration” was yuuuge. Amazing what the man has accomplished in two weeks. Well, really more like -2 weeks, since the numbers were collected prior to the inauguration.
The O’Reilly Factor is good, particularly the talking points at the beginning - he’s especially good on black issues, daring to go where few others dare.
Tucker Carlson, now having taken over from Megyn Kelly, is a good watch, particularly his big opening, often heated, interview.
And if you don’t believe the history on this, I’ve popped in many months over the past year of this thread to chronicle Foxnews ignoring the jobs data in the past. For some unknown reason, this month it was important enough to report on.
Jefferson: You mean black like African-American black? O’Reilly? He’s good with that?
That’s a pretty good distillation of why Fox News is such a piece of shit.
O’Reilly is going to interview Trump on Fox News just before the Super Bowl on Fox TV.
Themes accurate jobs report was the renunciation of Obama’s dismal economy at the ballot box. Jobs at Uber weren’t cutting it.
Yeah. That’s the one. Have you watched any?
I don’t have cable.