While not Playboy, Lindsay Lohan has posed nude (obviously NSFW)…
No, it was noticeably larger. Because I hadn’t noticed that it was a double issue, I was initially under the impression that it had somehow bounced back from its recent smallness.
I just checked, and you are indeed correct. The double issue is still nowhere near the size of the issues of old, though. The size difference is about the same between the single and double issues and the double issue to issues from early 2000s.
Maybe not now. I was once asked to leave a restaurant because I was reading a (political) article to my girlfriend from it, and although there were no suggestive pictures in sight, one partron noticed the name of the magazine and was offended.
That fact demonstrates that many “name” actresses are not necessarily averse to posing nude or semi–nude just so long as it’s not for Playboy. Doing it for a publication like GQ, Esquire, Vanity Fair, or even Maxim is perfectly acceptable and clearly indicates to everyone that your career’s on the rise; doing it for Playboy clearly indicates to everyone that the next time we’ll hear from you it will be for appearing in a “Surreal Life”-type reality show, checking yourself into rehab, or your obituary. The magazine now has such a tacky reputation that not even the most airheaded exhibitionist starlet/attention whore will consider posing for it as a way to advance her career. I mean even Paris Hilton turned them down.
That’s a good point. Another example is Jessica Biel, who chose Gear magazine (uh, what now?) to pose nude in order to get kicked off Seventh Heaven.
And Keira Knightley stripped off for Esquire. I was surprised to say the least.
frantically begins some rather furtive googling Image searching
For the 12 millionth time.
If no naughty bits show, then it’s not nude.
The actresses understand this perfectly well. That’s why they’re willing to pose for New York or Esquire in poses that show off nothing but arms and legs.
An arm across the breast is not nude. Lying on one’s stomach showing nothing but a side of a buttock is not nude. Strategically draped fabric is not nude.
This perfectly draped, i.e. photoshopped, lock of hair on this magazine cover means that no nude sullied the newsstands. (I’m sorry I can’t find a larger image to make it obvious how carefully one hair is placed.)
Either the flesh is covered or it isn’t. If it is then it’s not nude. Them’s the rules. I didn’t make them up. Everybody else seems to know them, though.
Jessica Biel was nude in Gear. She showed naughty bits.
ETA: I think this link should work. It’s noparsed to comply with board rules:
![http://www.webcamspornosms.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/jessica_biel_topless_gear5_lg.jpg[/noparse]](http://www.webcamspornosms.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/jessica_biel_topless_gear5_lg.jpg%5B/noparse%5D){kind=link}
Magazine and film skin followed diligently here:
Sorry for the hijack, but why ask you to leave and lose a customer? Why not just ask you to put it away?
I wondered about that too. Also, was the magazine folded over at the page you were reading from?
Yes, no nude images were showing. The other patron probably got the name of the magazine when I folded it over, primarily to fit on the table. And no, I didn’t expose the foldout and remark about how great her tits were.
Actually, they asked me to put it away, and I was in the middle of a deep discussion with my girlfriend and shocked that anyone was so prudish as to make that request. So when I said, “No, I won’t put away a magazine that has only text showing no matter what the other diner thinks,” they asked me to leave, and we did, without paying for anything (food had been ordered but not arrived). I made sure the manager knew why we were leaving.
Apparently one diner was more important than another. And I never went back, of course. In case you wonder, it was the Red Lobster, an upscale eatery in Burbank, California, during the lunch hour, and 30 years ago, so maybe things have changed.
Denise Richards has a feature every year.
I’ve read that Maxim has hurt Playboy in this regard. Actresses and models used to pose nude in Playboy for the “exposure”. Now they pose in lingerie in Maxim.
Damn, even when they go full frontal they still don’t choose Playboy. Milla Jovovich just did a spread as bare-ass naked as any you’ll find in Playboy but did it for Purple magazine. None of the coy nipple in a mirror nudity like Jessica Biel; Milla shows off her personal grooming habits. All I have to say is, WTF is Purple magazine?
[noparse]Support
Kee-rist, Jessica Biel is hot. Granted her face is only a 7 but that body is a 13.
By my calculations, that makes her a TEN.
To answer the O.P.I hope it isn’t.
I cant wait for Jennifer Aniston or Anna Kournakova to be served with a crippling tax bill or similar.
Once when I was very short of money I went into a shop to buy some food with my last remaining money and saw on the shelf a bag sealed, mans mag(I think that it might have been GQ)
that displayed the blurb “Jennifer Aniston Bares all”.
So instead of buying food I spent the money on the mag.
Got home,nada,zilcho,didn’t get to see so much as a nipple.
They had "accidently"given the wrong impression when they said "Bares all"as they meant it as in “Bares her soul”
Jennifer, I starved for you (literally),you owe me,get your kit off.
Red Lobster is upscale?