in the GD they tolerate this type of discussion if it is said in a fashion that is flowery enough, with just a hint of the plausible deniaibility but citing the very sources like Lynn who says it directly.
the manner this is treated is absurd.
I would not shut this down. But the moderation that warns someone for stating in a direct fashion:
this I find grotesquely hypocritical. An analytical statement. The same statement only not using the forbidden noun gains no warning which we know as there is the evidence as I did it . if you replace only the forbidden noun with the definition sentence copied from a dictionary goes without any comment.
the idea that somehow the mere use of the noun in this fashion is terrible is absurd - of course it does not preclude the moderating actual use as abuse and insult.