What makes your point of view racist is that you hypothesize genes as the explanation, but ignore how extraordinarily unsuccessful behavior genetic studies have been in finding genes that make anything more than the tiniest contribution to some measures of intelligence.
You stick to this genetic hypothesis despite the fact that none of these genes, as extremely small as their individual effects are, are shown to vary with populations you propose as ‘races’.
You promote studies that have yet to be replicated (in the race section of the link is a fairly famous study that was unable to be replicated) and I can tell you from experience, when dealing with human behavioral genetics especially, wait until the finding is replicated more than a few times.
What this means is that the evidence for your point of view is extremely weak (as in does not exist), yet you your view can be found in every thread where race and intelligence are even tangentially the topic.
On the other hand, you have the vastly disparate treatment of black people in America versus white people (or East Asians) that is in the published literature and on our news every day. This differential treatment that leaks into almost every aspect of our lives…you ignore or hand wave away.
What makes your behavior a facet of racism is how strongly you’ve bought into this pet hypothesis without evidence, while discounting the hypothesis that has far stronger evidence. It seems as though as you approach the evidence with your conclusion determined.
This leaves people like me assured with the idea that you’re a racist and this isn’t about science and finding justice for a taboo hypothesis, this is about your politics. You could disguise that more if in the future you show more doubt about your hypothesis and pretend to respect the huge number of studies showing disparities in the environments within which white and black people grow.