I would have thought if anyone’s media distrust was justifiable it would be Hillary.
And vice versa. It’s not as if she’s only hyper secretive and unforthcoming with the media. Planted questions at townhalls tell us she’s pretty suspicious of the public too.
Besides, now that we know Clinton is a Trump toadie who jumps whenever he snaps his fingers, why would you ever vote for her?
How can you possibly think this is an effective attack line? Nobody believes Hillary actually attended his wedding because of a donation. Why would you accept that deflection at face value? And it certainly wouldn’t follow that “Clinton is a Trump toadie who jumps whenever he snaps his fingers.” That’s just bizarre.
Maybe. We’ll see what the media narrative turns out to be.