“Breeches,” perchance?
I always assumed you were learned in the law, Noel.
Picky, picky, picky!
TMI, I realise, but my mother would have called those “dysentery britches”.
Kind of you to say.
How else does one keep the riff-raff in its place?
Fucking ignorent asshole.
*ignorant.
Moderator Warning
This is an official warning.
Personal insults are not permitted outside of the BBQ Pit forum. Please do not do this again.
Simply the best people on the planet for legal dress I must say. I get all my Court dress shirts from there still. Plus they deliever world over. Ok, you have to sometimes fight with customs, but man their stuff is awesome.
(Our American learned friends can buy shirts and Barrister Bags, so they don’t get left out).
E&R more or less have the market for academic robes cornered as well, not to mention having the ultimate database on various sorts of institutional regalia, down to regimental and school ties.
There’s quite avariety of robes, hats, ruffles and tassles around the world. In the western world, a lot must go back to mediaeval church influence, and through them back to Roman times (I notice that French references to legal robes refer to them as a toga).
As the thread is still going I just wanted to pick up on this. Kilts are not necessarily ceremonial - just a general purpose garment. It’s the other bits that decide how formal the get up is, jacket, sweater, shirt etc., how fancy the sporran is, what sort of shoes and socks, and so on.
For the range check out the pictures here. The full range from formal to casual.
Thanks. That site includes a short overview of the evolution of English legal dress: https://legal.edeandravenscroft.co.uk/EvolutionOfLegalDress.aspx
Oh, I have no doubt there is a an range of options, but why wear such an impractical garment other than in an impractical situation? They make great formal wear, but what can you do besides show off your legs without worrying about a wardrobe malfunction? They are a perfect match for tight bodiced gowns with trains.
I had an assistant who constantly mixed those two words up - most embarrassing when dictating memos dealing with contract cases!
This might illustrate the reason.
I love that clip but for the real use of the kilt in battle you need to see the next scene!
Why not? They’re not really more impractical than many other types of clothing. Women seem to manage in skirts well enough! (Actually, these days I suspect even in the Highlands they are mostly confined to “showing off” situations: weddings, balls, Highland Games, military events, etc)
Here’s Snopes on a notorious military kilt incident: Does Photo Show Queen Elizabeth II and a Colonel's 'Crown Jewels'? | Snopes.com
Actually, skirts are damned impractical in a lot of situations, walking up stairs, picking up things, being outside in the wind, running, dancing, fighting, pole vaulting, painting, gardening, skiing, laboratory analyses, clean room manufacturing, table service, retail sales, taking public transportation, cooking, cleaning, fixing the car, climbing a ladder …
Though, to be sure, I don’t believe men are expect to shave their legs when wearing kilts, so there’s that.
Judge’s robes in the US are a very practical length usually, long enough for modesty but not long enough for a trip hazard.