Well, you could just start admiring Bill Siksay…
Mais oui, matt, ça me fait très heureuse à voir quelqu’un qui combat pour nos droits. Que je puisse être canadienne, hélas!
Translation: “I hope that the inclusion of this illicit motive of discrimination in the law will make everyone understand clearly that you must not exclude people by reason of their gender identity or expression. Such discrimination is indefensible and this intolerance must stop,” said Mr. Siksay.
True, but most minority groups are the same way. I don’t know if it has anything to do with sexuality.
How am I confused? You stated your opinion which I would imagine you’d want others to share. Maybe advocate is the wrong word, but I don’t think I misinterpreted you.
I don’t think so. I don’t know where you get that idea from, but I have no problem with transgendered people. I don’t really agree with their agenda, but I don’t think people should do things to make life harder for them because they are different. The reason I started the thread was initially to understand why the groups came together, and if it’s been a beneficial union. I don’t think it has, but I’ve learned a lot about why many members of the GLBT community feel a kinship. If you would like me to clarify anything I’ve said, I will, but I really don’t feel as though I’m transphobic.
Uh, isn’t a large part of the so-called transsexual agenda that people not make life harder for them because they’re different?
How can you say you don’t agree with the transsexual agenda when you evidently don’t even know what it is?
Many people in this thread have outlined what it is. Let me amend my statement to, “I don’t agree with much of the transsexual agenda”. I think they should be treated equally, and should be afforded the same rights as everyone else. The main part I have a problem with is the optional gender and/or gender spectrum thing.
Yes, advocate was the wrong word, that’s all I was saying. It was a non sequitur in the context of my quoted paragraph. OK, thanks for clearing that up.
What you oppose about what you call our “agenda” still isn’t clear, though. The style of language used is reminiscent of a phrase used by homophobes, the infamous “homosexual agenda” which is used to rally against gay rights. If you don’t want to sound transphobic, you might want to steer clear of language that echoes homophobe speech. If you didn’t mean it that way, then it’s cool.