Thanks, Troy. I had been reading about that in the paper this morning, but hadn’t yet seen the clip.
This lady is fucked. I can’t imagine how she’ll get elected, especially if this type of thing continues from her, but if she does get elected, I think AZ will find itself fucked up beyond anything we can envision at the end of her term.
We all have encountered drunks like acted like she did in the debate. That is not proof of course. But it sure makes you wonder. It was her opening speech that she probably rehearsed 50 times. It was very important for setting a tone. It did ,but not like she wanted. She should have said forgive m," I am a tea bagger so cut me some slack".
She acted totally befuddled when the press asked her what was going on. She could have defused it with any reasonable answer. She had none. It was a horrible performance that will not sway tea baggers away from her.
My first thought was “over-rehearsed” - she had the look of someone who had her script memorized, but forgot a cue and had to improvise, something her “advisers” had sternly told her not to do.
This proves she was not talking about bodies being found in Mexico either.
She has a pretty substantial lead over her opponent so it doesn’t look like he’ll overtake her, unless she commits several more major blunders and his campaigns comes on really strong.
And, okay, I’ll say it: does she not have any other jacket but that lemon-lime number? She needs to take a page from the Sarah Palin Book of Campaign Perks – I’ll forgive her if it gives my eyes a rest!
Oh, she’s pretty much a lock. The whole “git the fedrul guhmint oudda mah bizniss / I’ll keep mah guns and munny, you keep the ‘CHANGE’” thing is huge here, and she’s playing to it bigtime.
NPR interviewed a local Arizona political correspondent on Friday afternoon. He said most people were a bit nonplussed by her performance (her “deer in the headlights moment,” as he described it), but that she was very, very popular for signing the illegal immigration crackdown bill, and would probably still win reelection.
At one point I had gotten the impression that she was genuinely struggling about whether or not to sign it. I think her final decision wasn’t based on a question about whether or not it was the right thing to do. I think the question was, “do I want to be elected governor?”
She has decided to forgo all future debates. Participating in this one gave her 1.7 million dollars in campaign funds. There is no more to get by more debates.
She has the right wing and the haters whipped up . That should insure her election. I thought there was more to governance than that. Live and learn.
She knows where the bodies are buried. Oops ,she doesn’t after all.
I also think she’ll win. McCain has drawn only token opposition and there aren’t any hot button ballot issues. SB1070 will be in the courts for a long time and the general election will be decided by paranoid seniors who live in fear of the Mexican drug cartel attacking the Sun City Shuffleboard league.
The crime rate is at very low levels, yet screaming wolf still works.
People who proudly proclaim ,“i don’t vote for the party, i vote for the person”, are going to have it easy. She is a joke of a candidate.
So in the gonzo world, you either have to favor being the only country in the world that allows unfettered immigration from neighboring countries, or you’re a “hater”.
Is that how it works?
I used to think this kind of hooey was simply a tactic to get impressionable people whipped up against conservatives, but the more time I spend around here the more it becomes obvious you people really think this way.
Can you offer an alternative explanation for the reason why anyone on the right who opposes illegal immigration is pretty much automatically referred to by lefties as a ‘hater’? I’ve seen nothing coming from any liberal anywhere to indicate that they feel conservative opposition to illegal immigration is based upon anything but racial hatred and/or xenophobia.