I apologize if this was covered before, and the question is being asked in good faith.
I read a lot of random books, and one of them was by a law professor (Campos) who argued going to law school was a bad idea for many bright students, especially those who lack connections and pay their own way. The tone of the book was remarkably negative and I don’t think reflects the experiences of the people I know who studied law. I am Canadian, and the book was about the US.
His arguments were that fees were much higher than most graduates could easily pay back, that the number of graduates who are employed at larger firms is very small, that many graduates are not employed at a job requiring bar-level knowledge, that meaningful “social justice” jobs pay poorly, that scholarships are often contingent on high placement but marking is arbitrary, that the Socratic teaching method used is inefficient, and that rankings of schools are less relevant than employment statistics. He felt law schools deliberately do not portray the realities of practicing law.
My knowledge of the law is very basic, and I know even less about lawyers and do not watch much TV. But the author clearly had an axe to grind. I’m sure some of his points are valid — teaching complex subjects can be dull and inefficient, fees are often high, school reputations can be overrated. But is the author broadly correct? Would you recommend a bright friend to go to a highly rated law school, or focus on other things?