Dr. Seuss was always much better in short format (the old half-hour animated specials like the Grinch). I don’t think there’s been a modern feature-length Seuss movie that didn’t have to keep dragging in tangents to fill the time.
The worst part I think is that Onceler is so disconnected from the villain, why didn’t they just scrap the book plot and rework the whole thing? Instead they kept it, but built around it.
Sorry to hear the movie sucked; I love the book. From memory:
So HERE, it’s the last of the Truffula seeds,
For Truffula trees are what everyone needs.
Plant a new Truffula. Treat it with care.
Give it fresh water, and feed it clean air.
Grow a forest. Protect it from axes that hack.
Then the Lorax and all of his friends may come back.
…
Is there anywhere I can get the DVD for fifteen cents and a nail and the shell of a great-great-great-grandfather snail?
You would think someone in Hollywood would be smart enough to figure out how to make a movie featuring three or four Suess stories. It would probably be difficult to do though since you would be taking that many properties and making only one vehicle for them. Not enough money in that, I would imagine.
As good as Chuck Jones’ adaptation of ***How the Grinch Stole Christmas ***was, even Jones had to do some padding to stretch the story out to fill 30 minutes (more like 23 minutes, really, allowing for TV commercials)!
As Ron Howard proved, stretching a Dr. Seuss story to fill 90 minutes results in a painfully unwatchable movie.
Well, the part where the Grinch looks at his appointment book was pretty sweet. Other than that, it didn’t add anything to the original, and made it worse by stretching it out over 90 minutes.