Is opposition of slavery is old is slavery itself? Other Q's.

I’m saying the differences between serfs and slaves, and treatment of either, is so tiny that it doesn’t bear serious consideration, compared to the differences between both as a class, and their Lords/Masters.

So any argument that attempts to emphasize their petty differences, rather than their similarities, is a counterproductive distraction, and only serves the interests of their oppressors (or their oppressors’ good names, at any rate) and all current oppressors of that same ilk.

That’s clear.

Hm. I never knew you were anti-welfare.

I’m totally for welfare.
But then you *know *I don’t think anyone on welfare is a Parasite, so this is just performance art on your part. How droll! What *fun *it is to mock the exploited! *Such *a laugh!

Southern slavery was particularly horrible from a historical context.

Isn’t that true for wrt the sort of slavery you saw in some societies?

Serfdom wasn’t nearly as bad as Southern slavery but it was comparable to some forms of historical slavery.