Is phi a mystical number?

**Is phi a mystical number?
**

Is phi a mystical number? Yes, it is!

Height of the Great Pyramid = 5813.011885 inches

5813.011885 x 1.618033988 = 9405.650803 inches

Length of the Grand Gallery = 1881.130161 inches

9405.650803 : 5 = 1881.130161 inches

The Grand Gallery with the number Phi (1.618033988 ) is the mathematical center of the Great Pyramid’s physical construction.

The Grand Gallery, number Phi and the Earth’s measurements:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34402764/Divine-Proportion-of-the-Great-Pyramid

:dubious:

As the master said:

Emphasis added

Uh, you do realize that the Great Pyramid isn’t a natural phenomenon, right? So some of the measurements of the Pyramid have phi show up in them: All that proves is that, then as now, some folks just like that number. It’s only mystical if gods like it, not humans.

Wait. Someone measured the height of the great pyramid in inches, to six decimal places? To an accuracy of one millionth of an inch, from the base? Meaning that the base is consistently flat to a tolerance of one millionth of an inch (or the measurement is invalid taken from a datum somewhere else on the base)

coughBOLLOCKS!cough

When were these measurements taken? At what time of day? What was the temperature at that time?

Not inches, pyramid inches, a special unit of measure designed to make the numerological woo (sorta) work.

Not* pyramid inches*, inches!

Well, the claim is that a ratio of lengths is related to phi, so it doesn’t matter at all what units are used.

But I rather suspect someone worked backwards from an answer they wanted …

Actually, since we’re dealing with millions of an inch, ya gotta ask, are these pre-1959 Imperial inches, pre-1959 US (Surveyor’s) inches (exactly 1/39.37 meters), or International inches (exactly 0.0254 meters)?

Has any adjustment been made for erosion? If not, then the ratio was different when it was built.

Is phi a mystical number?

No. However, three is a magic number, yes it is, it’s a magic number.

Not only erosion, but didn’t it originally have a golden cap on top?

But phi is the loneliest number that you’ll ever do.

One year and the number Phi
1 (tropical) year = 365.242 days

365.242 : 3.14159 = 116.2602377 days

116.2602377 x 1.618033988 = 188.1130161 days

365.242 : 188.1130161 = 1.941609398 days

1.941609398 x 1.618033988 = 3.14159

:wink:

1/2 = .5
.5 x 3 = 1.5
1/1.5 = 2/3
2/3 x 3 = 2
:wink:

A
A:B=C
C x D= E
A:E=F

then, yes, it’s not really a surprise that F x D = B, is it?

Showing my work:
F= A:E=A: (CxD)
thus
FxD=A:C=B

ETA: Beaten to it!

So what?
Please tell us what you mean by “mystical number”, and what the temperature was when the measurements you gave out in the first post were made and who made those measurements.

Attempts to make arithmetic look mystical make me sad.

Attempts to make arithmetic look mystical make the baby Einstein cry.

Not that anyone’s been taking the OP seriously, but remember folks: φ has but one interesting property of any note: φ[sup]2[/sup] = φ + 1. This is the only significant thing there is about φ, that it is the unique positive solution to this equation. If someone claims to have something to say about φ, but cannot figure out how it relates to this equation, then they almost certainly haven’t hit upon anything of note at all.

The measurements in the OP are worthless; there is no reason to believe those hold any relation to the actual values. On all of the Internet, they appear only in this thread and in one document by a “modern Canadian mystic and pyramidologist”, who provides no reason to believe he didn’t just make them up out of thin air, and who is, by all appearances, a woo-woo Cocoa Puffs harebrained nut.

And, yes, there’s nothing mystical about arithmetic, or anything else in math. Math is about clearing away confusion and gaining understanding, not sitting there slack-jawed in gaping awe. Good math, I daresay, should leave you saying “Oh, that’s obvious now”, not “Oh, wow! Look at the hidden magic of the universe!”