Perhaps you can explain the relevance of this to his point? Or, for that matter, what the fuck Sarah Palin has to do with women in general?
I assume it was a wild over-reaction to the word ‘cunt’. As if there aren’t plenty of male-specific insults.
In my view Sarah Palin harms the credibility of other, much more capable, female politicians. Her constant harping about ‘moma grizzly’s’ (I have no idea how to spell that 
) and ‘hockey moms’ is an embarassment to those who share her sex but stand on poilcy. Palin is in many ways how a chauvanist would expect a female politician to be.
Sarah Palin is an excellent barometer of the credibility of the people around her, both male and female. In general, the people around her who aren’t frantically looking for the exit have no credibility.
She is in no way representative of approximately half of the population, any more than any particular man is.
Palin was on Beck yesterday explaining because of treaty, we have to stand with our North Korean allies.
How many threads are you going to post this in? Are you auditioning for the left-wing counterpart of ralph124c?
Pish posh.
Did you that Ronald Reagan (aka Raygun) would be 99 years old now?.
That’s it! 
In each and everyone that discusses her qualifications for president or how smart she is . There are several going on.,I hope I have not missed any.
So, yes, then.
Heh. Weird coincidence, but I can definitely confirm that it’s not a tribute.
I did wonder. :dubious:
Raygun99’s username is a tribute to Ronald Reagan, who would be 99 now!
I couldn’t let it go.
Have you posted it in any in which it hadn’t already been discussed?
Shows remarkable prescience on his part, considering he signed up in '02.
A genuine prophet, he is.
I think when a serious contender for President reveals she has still no grasp of the complexities of the whole North-South Korea thing her gaffe should be raised at every opportunity until her supporters slink away and if at all possible, die of shame.
Her supporters will dig their heels in even deeper and defend her to the death, they are that stupid.
On the contrary, I think she’s raised the nonanswer to a high form of art through careful and studied practice of the craft. What do I expect her to say? Anything. Seriously, any freaking thing. Anything that shows there’s some substance behind her carefully crafted public persona, anything that’s not a platitude, literally anything. Say something about sanctions, say something about China, say something. I don’t expect her to be an on the spot think tank, but I expect her to show the same sort of off the cuff analysis on subjects that informed laypeople make here every day. I’m not setting a high bar, just a move from nonanswers to semi-answers. If you’re hinting that you want to be the President of the United States, at least show me that you read the paper.
What? People doesn’t count? Typical liberal elitist!
I agree.
But she’s not alone in that regard. Other, more recently elected public officials, have the same type of support.
I know, right? I can’t believe people keep voting McCain in, and that any Tea Party candidates made it into office at all is just sad.