The swab doesn’t come back with results in 24 hours, I believe. I may have left out an important clause: WHat proof do you think he could offer that they would accept?"
The birth certificate doesn’t list race. But if your Mom is white, and your Dad is white, you are not bi-racial.
I provided the cite. Read Shaun. If you read him he provides the cite. But by refusing to read actual accounts and preferring to read unreliable sources, It’s a lot easier to spew nonsense when an actual account is not studied.
But the man on the birth certificate is not his father. It’s a piece of paper, signifying nothing.
I think an examination of this Carson PAC is worth scrutiny.
That’s what he’s been told.
Are you suggesting that Shaun is his own cite? Really?
We need to bring back the old way of classifying racially mixed people-Quadroon, Octeroon, Mandingo, etc., that would clarify things.
I looked into that a bit–at first I suspected it was a bit of 4chan chicanery, a made-up PAC. But it looks like they’ve been around awhile. OTOH, looking at their website, they don’t exactly look like a set of power players.
Here’s some financial information on them.
At the same time, reading their press release, I suspect it’d be legally binding (though I’m obviously no attorney).
I suspect, really, this is an attention-grab. It’s not exactly been an active website.
If you ask me, the picture of him at 14 is the “blackest” look of them all. But the pictures of him as a little kid - assuming they’re genuine - have him at his “whitest”. (It’s my impression that bi-racial kids sometimes get darker as they age, but I could be wrong.)
Don’t waste your time trying to reason with those who are siding with King. They are bulletproof to logic. The fact that he’s been caught in a multitude of lies discredit. their agenda.
King has been caught. A fitting subplot to a phony movement.
I don’t know. Frankly what I’ve seen of King suggests that his veracity is shaky (and he is possibly involved in financial chicanery as well) and his wive seemed to allude to this in her post on the subject. But that doesn’t mean that he’s lying about this issue.
Interesting thing is that according to his version of events a lot of people would have to know his version of events. A couple of people (assuming they’re real people) have backed up this version, but there should be a lot of other people with similar knowledge. OTOH, I’m not sure this is a big enough story for the media to track those people down.
Coy? I’m not interested in giving some bitch blogger any credence. The conservative rags got their misinformation from her. She is a stalker and a creepy excuse for a human being. Seems to me you should ask Brietbart where they got their information, it certainly wasn’t journalism.
Sorry you have it wrong. The multitude of lies comes from the right wing with an agenda to stop him. He’s debunked everything
One more time. Why are you giving Shaun any credence? And his family members none?
You seem to be dubious that he was beaten up for being a white guy dating a black girl. You aren’t?
I hear that he was beaten for being a white guy dating a black girl. You seem to disagree. Now a question for you - is it the race of the beaters that determines whether it is a hate crime or the motivation?
D’Anconia, until you NAME the family member who allegedly said something I’ll give Shaun all the credence because he not only speaks and lives it, he has eye witnesses. The conservative right has… nothing.
Here is an eyewitness and another eyewitness.
And these are not 20-year-after-the-event eyewitnesses either.
Can you NAME the eye witnesses? Eye witnesses to what, btw?
Breibart smells to high heaven, it’s the same bullshit that happened to Sherry Sherrod by the same so called “news” organization. It’s clear what Breibart is all about. It’s shameful that CNN decided to run with it. Apparently other news organizations decided to remain credible and have learned not to trust Breibart since the Sherrod fiasco.