Is the Earth gaining weight?

Man, you guys are lucky for Cecil and me getting it 15 years ago…

I beg to differ. Any reaction - chemical or nuclear - that produces energy will lose mass according to the E=mc[sup]2[/sup] formula. It just that in chemical reactions, the mass loss is negligible.

For nuclear reactions, the energy is considerable. For example, deuterium ([sup]2[/sup]H) has an atomic mass of 2.014101. It consists of one electron, one neutron, and one proton. When one atom of deuterium fuse with another, it forms helium ([sup]4[/sup]He), which has 2 electrons, 2 neutrons, and 2 protons; the total number of “parts” of the two deuterium atoms. But the atomic mass of helium-4 is 4.002603, which is 0.025599 atomic mass units less than the sum of the deuterium. This missing mass has been released as energy.

The differ by which you beg is a fraction of a rounding error, so while you’re technically correct that the plants gain mass, all the plant life on Earth over the last billion or so years may have gained less mass through solar energy than the collective mass of the irretrievable space probes humans have launched over the last 50 years.

spingears. Please add factual comments to the thread. Suggesting that someone else can supply the estimate is why the poster is here. Looking for that someone.

Try to resist MPSIMS type posts.

samclem