This is obviously a heated matter and it is easy to lose one’s cool, but please try and focus on the scope of this OP, and this OP only, which includes: UNSC resolutions, their context, and their scope. Please leave personal opinions on the motivations of respective administrations out of it.
The case is this: is this war actually illegal, given the resolutions that were passed against Iraq in the decades past and recent history (at least up to 1441)?
Washington Post briefly discusses different sides.
UNSC Resolution 1441. UNSC Resolution 687. UNSC Resolution 678. These are the documents referenced in the article (you’ll need to browse to them, I get errors when I link directly).
So what I want to hear is, in light of these resolutions, is a move against Iraq really unauthorized, even if unpopular?
[sub]If this has been debated here previously, then I apologize and please link me to the discussion.[/sub]