Is there a statistically significant deviation from predictions? If so, has it been acknowledged by the IPCC scientists?
I’m not trying to fuel the pro/anti IPCC flames here, but rather, to help put this article and its claims in perspective, and I appreciate the reasonably skeptical approach I often see here in SD GQ.
A few years back, I tried to evaluate the science of anthropogenic global warming for myself, but unlike evloution, the complexity of the science and math surpassed my understanding. As a result, I tend to take the “conservative” approach to believe that the concensus opinion should be taken seriously, but that it could be wrong. (Anyone who has their mind made up on this issue is either a dedicated expert or a fool.) But I’d rather not debate the big question here, which would be more appropriate in GD.
Pointers to other articles on this subject from different viewpoints would be appreciated, as well.
As I recall from other science news, the global average atmospheric temperature hasn’t been rising in the last few years, but ocean temp has and sea ice minimums keep getting lower.
That Reuters article is really odd. It starts with what you quote, but contains no references to these “scientists”, just quotes that don’t appear to be in response to this claim from known AGW doubter Lomborg and some guy who’s an “expert in climate change and professor of economics”. Where’s the information from climate scientists?
The article from the Economist linked below talks in some detail about the divergence of the predictions and actual temperatures. See the chart “Falling Off the Scale”.
The problem is that the models assume a smooth increase, but climate doesn’t work like that. You get big jumps, then plateaus and little falls etc, and depending on where you take the start and end points on the graph, you can either demonstrate major warming, no change or even cooling.