Is there a solution to this?

Read today’s strip. Is there a solution to the problem outside of insurance fraud?

You take the fox over first then go back for a chicken. You then drop the chicken of and take the fox back with you. You then drop off the fox and take the second chicken to the first chicken. you then cross the river again by yourself and pick up the fox and head back to the chickens.

Take fox, return empty, take chicken, return with fox, take chicken, return empty, take fox.

Wow. In the time it took Dilbert to load for me, two people answered this before I got the chance.

I could never get into these problems. I know if I physically had a fox, two chickens, and a boat in front of me and it was a real problem, the solution would seem obvious. On paper I’m not good at them.

How about three cannibals and three priests. You have to get al six across. Rules:

Cannibals will only eat priests when left with one priest
The boat cannot return empty.

I haven’t been able to solve it.

Answer here

Chavardz, please clarify. If one cannibal is left with one priest, will the cannibal eat the priest or do the cannibals have to outnumber the priest too? Won’t three cannibals eat two priests?

Of course not unless you specify you can bring two passengers with you as your link says you can.

Peace.

Take two cannibals across, return with one.
Take two cannibals across, return with one.
Take one cannibal, one priest across, return with priest.
Take two priests across, return with two cannibals.
Take one priest, one cannibal across, return with one cannibal.
Take two cannibals across, mission completed.

But then, if you can’t trust the cannibals to behave themselves, they’ll probably attack you as you ferry them across the river, come back for the third cannibal, and sail off together for Tahiti.