Is there a term for "trade names that become generic"?

I was blogging on this topic and stopped to do some research on the concept of trademarks losing their ownership. I came across your post and disagree with the use of “genericide.”

Please see my post:

http://www.anothernormal.com/?p=52

I’d love to hear what you think. I believe I’m right. Am I wrong?

Rudy


MODERATOR NOTES:
(1) Please note that this is a post from 2008, until revived in post #12 in Oct 2013.
(2) LINK TO STAFF REPORT IN QUESTION: Is there a term for “trade names that become generic”? - The Straight Dope

Genericity. #6

Welcome rudy713.

It’s customary to link to the column you’re commenting on. No biggie.

http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/meponym.html

Wait. Do you disagree that people sometimes use the term or that Ian called it waggish, and it’s related collocation, “victim of genericide,” hopeless?

Hi.

runner pat”: Please except my apologies. I didn’t realize that I should’ve linked to the column. I will from now on.

Gfactor”: I think that the term is being used incorrectly. “Genericide” is the elimination of things generic. And a victim of “genericide” is probably someone who no longer is able to drink coffee because their Starbucks has been eliminated. The article in question talk about things becoming generic.

When a trademark becomes generic, it should be termed (my word, my opinion) teemicide (T M icide), or… it’s been “gentrified,” (though this relates more to race).

Rudy

I think the word you’re looking for may be Genericised; when a product brand name (Such as Thermos or Hoover or Aspirin) becomes the Generic Name for all products of that type, regardless of manufacturer.

[QUOTE=rudy713]
Hi.

Gfactor”: I think that the term is being used incorrectly. “Genericide” is the elimination of things generic. And a victim of “genericide” is probably someone who no longer is able to drink coffee because their Starbucks has been eliminated. The article in question talk about things becoming generic.
Rudy
[/QUOTE]

Ian called the usage, “waggish” and “hopeless.” In other words, he’s arguing against it. Teemicide sounds like you’ve killed one of our board members (Cecil calls them the Teeming Millions). :eek:

Exmark.

[QUOTE=Martini Enfield]
I think the word you’re looking for may be Genericised; when a product brand name (Such as Thermos or Hoover or Aspirin) becomes the Generic Name for all products of that type, regardless of manufacturer.
[/QUOTE]

Genericide gets used, but it is intended as a half-pun.
http://www.wordspy.com/words/genericide.asp
http://www.inta.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=202&Itemid=126&getcontent=1
That’s why Ian called it waggish. It doesn’t fit the usage pattern for the ending “cide” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/cide (“killer”) which is Rudy’s point. But in context it conveys the idea–killing the distinctiveness of a mark by using it as a generic term.

[QUOTE=runner pat]
http://www.straightdope.com/mailbag/meponym.html
[/QUOTE]
The formatting of this article is really screwed up: There are random line-breaks everywhere. (Inserting hard line breaks at all in that article was a mistake, but the sheer frequency is very off-putting.)

Just an observation - Aspirin is a generic name in the US, but is still a brand name in Canada; you’ll find lots of bottles of ASA or Acetylsalicylic Acid up here.

Usufruct
(I know, “band name!”)

An alternative to “genericide” which has the virtue of ending in “nym” is “commonm.”

? Not on my browser (Firefox).

That has your name on it. That’s not much of a cite.
Commonyms

Please note that you are responding to a five year old post.

I would use “genericization” for the process, and the terms have been “genericized”.

Not “genericated”. Possibly “detrademarked”, though that seems to imply an intentional surrender rather than unintentional cultural hijack.

I posted to make a suggestion, not a citation. I’m not attempting to disguise or deny my advocacy for the term

As far as I know, these are the terms that are actually used. “Genericity” seems to have died out for this usage.

usufruct

Which is why I would use them. :wink: