Recently discovered that British* Bacon is different from both Canadian Bacon, and American Bacon. So, is there a definition of bacon that matches the different foods bearing this moniker?
*picture a thin slice of boneless pork chop (about the thickness of what gets labelled as “thick cut” bacon in the US), and you’ll have a good sense of the monstrosity Brits defile the name of bacon with. I suspect this is revenge for the cheese fiasco.
That’s what we call streaky bacon. The most common British bacon is back bacon, and there’s also middle bacon, which I don’t see quite as often. They’re all good, but a good smoked back bacon done near-crispy, with the fat attached, is pretty much peak bacon.
Sorry, but there is no requirement for bacon to be “crispy” - I much prefer a meaty thick-cut piece of back or middle bacon fried soft, for the perfect bacon roll (with HP Sauce, natch).
The crisp wafers of streaky bacon that I get in America is a betrayal of cured pork products.
I can find back bacon at the local Vons, so we always have it on hand when the need for a proper fry-up or EBCB arises. But Neuske’s is a perfectly cromulent substitute for colonials.
The traditional method of making bacon in Britain is to cure, and optionally smoke, an entire side of pork. This naturally means that the cut is irrelevant in defining bacon – it’s the method of preservation that’s important. The exception, in British usage, is the hind leg: if cured as part of the rest of the carcass, it’s gammon; if cured separately, it’s ham. (Traditionally, that is: nowadays, the distinction seems to be that gammon is sold cured, but uncooked, while ham is sold cured and cooked.)
I don’t know why Americans chose to only make bacon from belly pork, but they’re missing out on some tasty culinary options, if you ask me, which you didn’t, but I’m telling you anyway.