Questions brought up by the recent salary cap on CEOs of companies receiving bailout money:
- Does a good CEO make a difference?
- Does a good CEO make a difference that is worth millions of dollars per year in compensation?
Yes, I know that the market has decided that they are worth millions per year, but is there an objective way to find out whether that valuation is correct?
For example, it is possible that there is some sort of (implicit) collusion among the top-level people who make up the ranks of CEOs and members of boards of directors, so that they pay each other huge salaries. The huge salaries don’t affect the companies that much (since some of these companies make billions per year), so even though it is not optimal, it continues. (BTW: I’m not saying that there is collusion, but just trying to say that just because “the market” decided that CEOs are worth millions, doesn’t mean that it is rational or the optimal level of compensation)
I agree that there are people like Jobs that do make a difference. He brings vision and the attention to detail and form & functionality, and also has a lot of charisma in interacting with the public, journalists and investors, so overall, he has a huge positive impact on the direction Apple takes.
But there aren’t that many Jobs out there.
What got me thinking about this was the performance of all these financial companies that collapsed. The collapse of 100-year-old institutions shows that their CEOs are either idiots or inconsequential to the functioning of the company. In either of those two scenarios, their huge pay is unjustified. Look, you can put a monkey in charge of a 100-year-old institution, and it can easily drive it to the ground, you don’t need a multi-million-dollar CEO to accomplish that.
These CEOs did nothing to stop their companies’ collapse from happening. Most likely they didn’t even see this coming. And, even worse, in many cases their decisions actively led to the downfall.
And these were not some random people. These were CEOs of major corporations. These were people who were paid multiple millions per year because people believed that these CEOs had a huge experience and talent, and would be able to run multi-bilion dollar companies successfully. Obviously, people were wrong about these CEOs.
But what about other CEOs? We don’t always have huge meltdowns to help show the incompetence of CEOs in various industries.
I recall a study a few years back (in one of the financial magazines, like Forbes), where they tried to quantify CEO behavior by comparing the market cap of the company at the end of the CEO’s term with the market cap at the beginning. It’s been a while so I don’t remember the details, but I recall that they showed that the biggest-paid CEOs did not bring the biggest gains for their companies, and in fact many caused their companies’ market cap to drop dramatically.
Of course, one might say, “Well imagine how much the market cap would have dropped without this awesome CEO”, but I think that’s weak. It’s like being tutored by a crappy tutor, and after failing a test, he says “Well imagine how much worse you would have done without me”.
In any case, it seems to me that there is no way to objectively quantify how much of a difference a *particular *CEO makes to a company.
But, the whole financial meltdown fiasco (and of course, the auto industry fiasco) has shown to me that multi-million-dollar CEOs are *not *worth the amounts of money they are paid.
Your thoughts?
-
Is there a way to objectively quantify how much a CEO is worth?
-
Is the current CEO salary level just a bubble that will go away, or is it the proper amount they should be paid because of all that they bring to their companies?
-
Is there any market inefficiency (e.g. some form of collusion) that is allowing these high salaries to continue indefinitely?
-
Has the collapse of many 100-year-old financial mega-corporations due to their actions wrt subprime mortgages, mortgage-backed securities, and credit-default swaps, led you to change how you view/respect highly-paid CEOs of big companies?