I vote for “Rove’s Law.” AskNott’s explanation was excellent.
Though clearly Giuliani used 9/11 to his political advantage, I don’t think he used 9/11 to justify every damn thing he wanted to do quite like Rove did.
Though I do like the term Giulianification…perhaps Giulianification could refer to the process by which a man abandons his bad comb-over.
“Boy, that Donald Trump is an ugly mofo, but he’d look a hell of a lot better if he just Giulianified himself.”
At least Rove left one useful part of his legacy. 
(I like “9/11’d the debate”, though. Can that be the Canadian dialect version or something?)
I agree, this would be the correct way. However… everything is different now… since… well, you know.
Anaamification seems easier to say/remember actually. Anaamification and Anaamika’s Law.
(Otherwise, “9/11’ed” or simply “9/11!”.)
Hah, Anaamification would be awesome but I don’t think it’s going to fly. I still think
Rove’s Law
9/11ed
both work, but “bushwhacked” is definitely good in a pinch!
Why do you people hate freedom?
I like it! Or if a man loses his third wife to divorce…and I agree about the political advantage. Plus, it puts the focus on the wrong guy.
How about W’ed?
And one short one.
And a field, don’t forget that.
I like putting Rove’s name on it.
“Yeah, we were having a nice discussion about James Joyce, and then Bill went and Roved up, and I’m all, like, ‘Thank YOU, Captain Buzzkill!’ That fucker has Roved more conversations than anyone I know.”