Is there any likelihood of mass hari kari occuring in Japan?

You’re talking about André Fortin (frontman for Les Colocs, actually one of Quebec’s most famous bands in the 90s), but I’m not sure why you’re singling him out and especially in such a manner. He committed suicide because he was depressed. He did slice himself up with a knife, but I don’t think he’s the only one who did it recently; you only heard about it because he was famous.

I’m singling Fortin out because he and Inokuma were the only two reasonably famous people to commit seppuku since Mishima.

Japan does see a fair number of suicides for taking responsibility for things. Not a very high number in absolute there, as a percentage of suicides or as a percentage of those responsible for scandals, fatal accidents, bankruptcies or negligence in any of these, which are all cases where I have heard of suicides.

I used to go to a friend’s family house for cherry blossom viewing at his house in Oita-ku in Tokyo. The father, a predominant attorney had borrowed heavily against the house to purchase stocks at the end of the bubble in the late 80s. The bubble crashed, he lost everything including the house which had been in their family for generations. His father killed himself rather than move out.

Was that a case of responsibility suicide (to his ancestors) or being depressed? I don’t know, but what a waste of a really good man.

Humm. I’m never sure when I’m being whooshed or not.

It’s “kamikaze,” although the Japanese use tokkotai

Exactly. That is a question I have as well, which I’ll address after the question of why we still aren’t burning witches at the stake.

Can I play along? I don’t understand your point and I live in Japan. (Except when I play the part of a refugee.) Can you provide more hints as to why the outcome of two completely different scenarios should be the same, other than that the location is based in the same country?

If you use nuclear power, you must be prepared to deal with accidents. Coal-or gas-firing plants will not cause as wide-spread contamination if there is an accident.

Japan experiences 20% of the world’s strongest earthquakes and the fault lines run in the sea by the island. If there is a major earthquake, there will be a strong likelihood of a major tsunami.

If you cannot predict that, and decide how to design the facilities to handle the subsequent damage, you need to review your 8th grade geology and change jobs into something which your incompetence will hurt the public as much. Maybe start running tours or something.

Whatever you do, you don’t just utilize a model which is inherently dangerous for your location.

Anyone who thinks that the idea on how to take precautions is after an earthquake should never be let within a hundred miles of the plant, thank you.

I do not buy that planning was adequate. The plant was designed to handle an 8.2 earthquake.

Sixty-six, but close enough, and I agree with the points you make.

The Washington Post had an article the other day which said that it was likely that an earthquake of magnitude 7.5 would have produced a tsunami large enough to knock out the generators.

In other news: The president of Tepco has been hospitalized from a failed seppuku attack. NOT. Stress from hypertension. Damn, they don’t make them like they used to.

The LA Times this morning has an article Japan fears post-quake rise in suicides