Is there anything wrong with "class warfare"?

[septimus]

And please, mmmbeer (and any of his would-be defenders) do be aware that the question on the table is not whether payroll taxes should be counted as taxes. The question on the table is:

When I write
[QUOTE=Septimus]
Right now, Romney and lowest-wage workers pay about the same, about 13% each. Do I understand that you want to drop Romney’s rate to 10% while increasing the rate on lowest-wage workers (payroll tax plus income tax) to 23% ?
[/QUOTE]

Is it rational, or even sober, to respond with

@mmmbeer

See where it says EACH according to his mean? 20%…If you were get out your dictionary, you would find that EACH means everybody!
20% for everyone, where the hell do you get that I want to drop Romney’s rate to 10% and raise the lowest-wage workers to 23%
20% for everyone means if Romney is someone, his rate would be 20% and if the lowest-wage worker is someone, guess what his rate would be? 20% Is that clear enough for you?

My proposal for 10% was guess what? 10% for everyone. I was commenting back to the person who suggested 20% for WHO???, understand yet??, yeah, EVERYONE.
Do I have to spell out again that means for Romney AND the lowest-wage workers? Jesus, Joseph, and Mary.