Is this a good laptop for me?

I’m thinking about getting a desktop replacement laptop. Then I can buy a bigger monitor for home use, but then grab the laptop when I’m on the road. I’m currently using a four-year-old Gateway, Win98, AMD K-7, 599 MHZ, 60 GB on the hard drive. (no laughs, please) :wink:

I mainly use it for games, regular home-use stuff, and playing media files (I’m a composer, so I need something that can handle large files and play them back smoothly).

I found this and it looks pretty good. What do you think?

Also, what’s the deal with this Wi-fi networking? How does that work? You just plug something in and you don’t need wires to connect to the internet? Are there monthly charges in addition to that? If I choose not to do that, can I still use dial-up?

It says it comes with Windows XP… can I change that? I’ve heard terrible things about XP.

I’m really looking for something that’s going to last… something I can use for a long long time, so please let me know if I’m on the right track. Be brutal!

That’s just a regular notebook. A true desktop replacement notebook is one of these or one of these

If you’re using it for games, that "ATI MOBILITY RADEON 9000 IGP graphics with 128MB of shared Memory (memory is taken from the main RAM) " is a no-no.

For a comparable price, you can get order a Dell 9100 with 128 MB **dedicated ** video memory.

Wi-fi networking lets your computer connect into a wireless network, which then connects into the internet. Several public areas tend to have free public wireless connections - Airports, Starbucks, some McDonalds. If you had broadband, you could set up a wireless net work by plugging a wireless router(about $50-$60) into your cable or dsl modem, and then have multiple computers able to connect into the net at the same time - you could either get a wireless card (about) $40 to put into your old desktop, or plug in in via a ethernet cable to the router, and you could use the laptop anywhere in the house. But it seems like you still have dial-up, so sharing a net connection isn’t an option. The computer you linked to has a modem, so you could you dial-up just fine.

You could probably change it, though some parts might not have working drivers for older versions of Windows. What exactly have you heard that is terrible about Windows XP? I have been using XP for over 2 years now, and it is much more stable than Windows 98. In 2 years, it has crashed on me only 4-5 times; with 98 I was getting crashes every couple of days. XP is better than any other OS Microsoft has made, except for Windows 2000, which is pretty much XP without eye-candy.

As for the computer you linked too, it isn’t bad, though it seems pricey for what you get - it only comes with 256 MB RAM, which is the minimum needed to get XP to run well, and it seems to be using integrated graphics as well.

Personally, I would grap one of these machines, though I admit I am a gamer to whom the Radeon 9600 video card it has would be very important. And I am more of a fan of AMD processors too.

Thanks for the answers so far, guys. I’m not entirely in the dark when it comes to computers, but I definitely don’t have the knowledge that a lot of Dopers have.

<b>astro</b>, the Sony one is a little out of my budget, but the HP looks pretty good to me. I printed out the page to keep it in mind.

<b>Agape</b>, thanks for the info on the graphics card. You mean a Dell Inspiron 9100, right?

<b>RandomLetters</b>, so RE: the wi-fi, you’re saying I could dial-up, but without the wires? I would only keep one computer; I’m not interested in networking more than that. But you’re saying I could keep my dial-up service, pay $12/month (or whatever) and still be able to dial into it without using wires, no matter where I am as long as I have that router? Or am I misreading?

About Windows XP, basically I’ve just heard that it’s very prone to viruses, crashes, etc., and my father-in-law has had a lot of problems with it. Of course, that could be his own doing too, as he’s quite new to the world of computers, but I’ve also heard people here say the same thing.

That eMachine you linked to actually looks pretty good, but the one I linked to indicates that it comes with 512 MB of RAM, not 256, like you mentioned. It’s about 6 questions down on the Product Specifications list… or again, am I just misreading?

Thanks again for the replies so far!

The Wi-Fi internet access at Starbucks and McDonalds (and most airports) is public, but it’s definitely not free. Often local coffee shops will have free Wi-Fi access, but not Starbucks.

XP actually works pretty well. The only real bitch I have about it is compatibility. If you run software meant to work with anything in the 9.x line (95, 98, or ME) or something old that works with NT 4.0 you might have trouble running it under XP. Older games are particularly likely to give you trouble.

Everything else you listed should be no problem. As others have mentioned, make sure you get one with a decent graphics interface. Many laptops used shared RAM for the video RAM. Games prefer dedicated video RAM and lots of it.

As for viruses and crashes, XP is probably less succeptible to these things than previous versions of windows. I’d recommend turning off a lot of the stuff that XP likes to turn on by default, like remote system management and that damn messenger.

Maybe this explanation will help. Microsoft used to have 2 operating system lines, the windows line and the NT line. Windows used to follow a nice easy numbering scheme, up until after version 3. Windows 95 is windows 4.0, windows 98 is version 4.1, and windows ME is windows 4.9 (or at least that’s how they identify themselves). Windows is backwards compatible to DOS, which is good because of compatibility, but bad because a really mucked up program can easily take down the entire operating system.

This is where NT comes into play. NT has a thing called the hardware abstraction layer, which prevents misbehaving programs from doing much damage to anything but themselves. It also royally screws with backwards compatibility. The NT line is NT 4.0, Windows 2000, which is really NT 5.0, and Windows XP, which is NT 5.1.

The main things that are going to cause compatibility problems are trying to jump from the old windows line to the NT line, and going from one major version to another (like 4.0 to 5.0). Minor versions (like 5.0 to 5.1) don’t usually cause much trouble.

The windows line is more succeptible to viruses, crashes, etc. because of the lack of protection mechanisms in the operating system. Microsoft also has no desire to support windows (they officially killed the line off with XP) so they aren’t making the security patches to them either.

And finally, wi-fi is just a wireless connection. You have a box that connects into your internet connection just like a computer would, and then the wireless port on your computer which connects to the box via radio waves. The actual internet connection is the same as you would have for a regular wired computer. All you are doing is adding a radio link in the middle so that you can make the laptop more portable.

GQ is for factual answers.

You got some, but opinions belong in IMHO.

Moved.

samclem GQ moderator

There is a compatibility mode for running programs under Win 95, 98, etc., but I’m not sure how many programs that works for. All the old games I’ve tried actually ran under XP without any trouble, and some of them were older DOS games like Skyroads.

With regards to wireless, for home use I’m inclined to wait a few months to see what happens with this Broadband over powerlines before you sink a bunch of cash into equipment that you may not need in a couple of years. Unless, of course, you have the money to spend and you want it NOW. If you DO go with wireless, for best performance and ease of troubleshooting make sure all your wireless gear is made by the same manufacturer. Some pieces of equipment have proprietary modes that will only work with routers/cards/whatever made by the same company (not that a Linksys router, for example, won’t work with a Belkin card… but it’ll work better and be easier to set up with a Linksys card.). Also, if everything is made by the same company and you have to call tech. support, you won’t hear “OK, your wireless router is all set up! You’re in business! What’s that? How do you get your wireless card (made by another company) to connect to the network? No idea… call them!”

Another issue is that you are using Win98 (yeah me too; Win 98SE on my main computer… for reasons that don’t pertain to this discussion) now… is that first edition or second edition? If it’s first edition, you want to upgrade. Microsoft no longer supports FE; and that means no more updates, and also means that most producers of other computer equipment won’t support it either. This could lead to major problems if you need to call tech. support for help: “What’s that? You’re using 98 FE? I’m sorry, but we don’t support that OS… you may be able to get your wireless card to work with it, but I can’t help you do it…”

The compatibility modes didn’t do squat for me. I had such hopes for them too.

I personally tried Duke Nukem (crashed), Unreal (would only run in a window, which was very annoying, but I’ve heard other folks have gotten it to work), and Heavy Metal (wouldn’t even install). At that point I was 0 for 3 on games and pretty much gave up. I also tried Protel (an electronics design package) and it too failed miserably. Anything I had that wouldn’t run under XP wouldn’t run no matter what the compatibility modes were set to. I later tried a bunch of dos games and got many of them to run with no sound, but never got any of them to run with sound.

As with all things though, YMMV. I seem to have had worse luck than many, judging from what I’ve heard on the internet.

XP, despite the major facelift, is really just a minor version increase from windows 2000. The user interface is a lot different, but underneath the hood its mostly the same. Any game (or other software for that matter) that was written after win2k came out will probably work fine with XP.

Unless e-machines have changed drastically in the last few years, don’t touch them with a 10 foot pole. They have an absolutely dreadful reputation for customer service. See here for example.

Gaming on laptops is difficult, unless you can buy a top of the line laptop and replace it every year or (maybe) two.

I bought a top of the line Dell in 1999. It was just about the best and most expensive laptop they made, complete with a decent graphic card and lots of RAM. The problem is, the video cards made for laptops, even the best available, are at least a couple generations below the best cards for desktops. Less than a year later, I was getting frustrated because it couldn’t keep up with the newest games coming out.

Other than that, laptops are great. But I would never have one as a gaming machine again.

I know e-machines doesn’t have the best reputation for quality, but that particular model has a bizarelly good reputation on the tech sites that I frequent.

  1. If you can find a router than can dial up other computers, you could. I have never seen a router with dial-up ability, but they probably exist. Most routers are designed to be plugged into a cable or dsl modem with an ethernet cable.

  2. All versions of Windows have problems with viruses & spyware. As for crashes, most of those I have seen in XP have been from either bad hardware or massive spyware infections. If you keep your machine clean (by using Firefox or Opera to browse, be careful of what you download, use Ad-Aware and Spybot regularly) like I do, and have good hardware, XP will will very rarely crash. With Windows 98, I had boxes with nothing running and perfectly good hardware that would occasionally crash at random.

My advice is when you get a laptop, is to try XP for a couple weeks (turn off the Fischer-price interface if it bugs you) and see how well it works to you. Also be sure to clean out the crap programs all the large computer company tend to pre-install.

  1. Oops, my misread. Anyways, I personally would prefer a Athlon 64 to a Pentium 4 in a notebook; Pentium 4’s put out more heat, and the Athlon 64’s throttling technology (laptop processors can cut back their clockspeed when they are not be used heavily, for less power & heat) seems to work a lot better than the stuff Intel has in their Pentium 4 mobile chips. Of course this isn’t as important if you plan to use it as a desktop replacement. But if you do get the Athlon 64, don’t be suprised if it tells you its running at 800mhz when you go to system properties; if you aren’t doing anything, it doesn’t need to run as fast.