Looking at a token souvenier from the birth of my daughter, the hospital gave us a non-offical certificate that states her particulars. There is one line that doesn’t sound quite right.
" Teagan O’Hara Arndt was born in this hospital at 8:38 *o’clock, A.M. * on Saturday…"
Shouldn’t it be one or the other?
That sure doesn’t sound right. I’d call my journalism teacher but he’s kick my butt if I admitted I didn’t remember, my “Caps and Spelling” and “Style Guide” are at home. All I have to say, as unsupported as it may be, that sounds weird.
As I recall, it would be considered archaic,perhaps an almost extinct usage, but not necessarily wrong. All it means is that at 8:38 ‘of the clock’, meaning the clock read 8:38. Seems redundant, don’t it? Probably why almost no one uses that form.
All you need to start an asylum is an empty room and the right kind of people.
According to The Chicago Manual of Style (I know that should be italicized, but I’m UBB Code-impaired), "The abbreviations for periods of the day [i.e., A.M. and P.M.] should not be used with “morning,” “noon,” “afternoon,” “evening,” or “night,” nor should they be used with “o’clock.”
I think she means it sounds redundant, like saying “8:30AM in the morning.”
“It was us versus them and it was clear who them was. Today we are not so sure who the they are, but we know they’re there.”
– Texas Gov. George W. Bush, presidential candidate.