Is This Sound Conjecture Or Mere Solipsism? (Psych 101)

PSYCHOTHERAPY: PURPOSE, PROCESS AND PRACTICE

http://www.surrenderworks.com/acim_on_psychotherapy.html

Sounds good to me so far. Arguments?

Well, that’s clearly not true. If I have, I dunno, bacterial pneumonia, two weeks of penicillin will do me a lot more good than two months of therapy.

Will psychotherapy fix a broken leg?

My friend has cancer. Will psychotherapy cure him?

My 93 year old Grandmother is dying of old age. If she gets psychotherapy will she be cured?

That person needs psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, to fix their disjointed thoughts. That these thoughts leads to disjointed sentence structure. So they need psychotherapy. The only form of therapy. Is psychotherapy.

Guys, I presume they don’t mean that all diseases are all psychosomatic, just mental ones. Even so, that assertion is demonstrably false. Say what you want about psychiatry, Tom, but drug therapy is most certainly effective in many cases as these disorders have a biological basis and are not just learned behaviors.

Strep induced OCD. A “sick mind” that can be fixed by an antibiotic.

and

Yes, they do:

This is warmed-over Christian Science. Since God is perfect, he creates only perfect things. Therefore, if you have a sick, diseased body, that’s just an illusion caused by Satan. With prayer/psychotherapy you dispel the illusion and are healed.

Think of it as pure science of mind.

Prayer Placebos?

Jefferson?

More like pure gobbledegook that flys in the face of observable evidence. You might just as well say that we’re all disembodied minds being kept in a computer program, ala The Matrix.

I think of it as pure unmitigated bullshit.

If your premises are trivially falsified by empirical observation, what you’re doing isn’t “science”.

Placebo can work to make people feel better. It ain’t gonna set a broken leg, now is it?

So it seems to many.

“Science” is anecdotal by Nature.

Got one?

Hypothetically, yes. Otherwise, try a different focus.

If by that you do mean something like “pure solipsism”, then I would agree. Otherwise, not so much.

adhay, you are lapsing into incomprehensibility again.

Cum see, come sah?

One more time, please stay on topic.

How long have you been saving that one?

Ever since.