The two sites that have been named in this thread are unfortunately inundated with cases from all over the country. In particular Guardians of Valor says they get hundreds of emails and messages a day. They try to prioritize cases based on if there appears to be any financial fraud. And then they have to wait on FOIA requests and other such avenues. I like that site in particular because they are very meticulous and make sure they never accuse anyone in error. So these things take time.
Heads-up for you: mere attention is not “profit.”
If they are looking to gain money or some other tangible consideration by passing themselves off as military (or ex-military), then they can probably be charged, in most cases, under fraud statutes. If they try to claim benefits; if they try to claim military discounts; if they try to get people to donate to them, or to some bogus charity, under the guise of fake military service, then there’s a good chance they’ve committed some sort of fraud.
But if all they’re doing is attention-seeking, it’s not the same thing. It’s like some other asshole who claims to be a doctor, or a venture capitalist, or something, to get women to like him. Makes him a douchebag, but i can’t get too worked up about it.
Meh.
I feel no such doubts, as a general principle. The number of frauds are so small, compared to the thousands who actually served, that it barely makes a blip on the radar. As i noted earlier in the thread, over 100,000 Americans have been awarded the Combat Action Badge; a couple of fakes doesn’t turn me into a raging skeptic every time i meet someone who claims to have served in Iraq or Afghanistan.
Spare me the histrionics. If all they get is a bit of attention, i simply can’t get worked up about it. And if they actually defraud people using claims of military service, then i am completely fine with them being prosecuted under the appropriate laws.
And if they get caught faking military service, for gain or just for attention, i’m happy to declare that they are assholes and losers. But i’m not going to run around venting outrage just so everyone can see how much of a heroic defender of the troops i am.
I have no barrow to push for the LDS Church. I’m an atheist myself, and i’ve been outspoken against plenty of Church actions, including their massive dollar-dumping in California to sway the vote on Proposition 8 in 2008. And in this case, it does seem that removing the one image and not addressing the broader concerns about Johnson constitutes pretty bad journalistic ethics and practice.
Unfortunately it’s a big fucking blip. And seemingly getting bigger.
To quote Don Shipley:
That’s just one guy dealing with one small portion of the military. Watching him rip apart a phony SEAL is a thing of beauty. If anyone has a phony SEAL claim to check he is the one to do it. The SEALs have their own databases that they can check. He now charges a small fee due to the amount of time he has to spend doing it. He donates all the money. The fee is to keep his workload down and reduce the amount of requests to only the important ones. That’s how many are out there.
It’s not just an American thing. The Brits call them Walts.
And no one is forcing you to care, read these threads or even open them.
emphasis mine.
As this is GQ and not GD, I’ll try to frame my response within the rules of this forum.
There are many who feel that the LDS church is a “bogus” organization. Certainly my feelings are well known among those here who read treads on Mormonism. I’ll leave it at that.
This is exactly the purpose of this man’s story and the reason why it was written up in the Mormon Church owned newspaper and then reprinted on the Mormon Church website. This man may not be attempting to get cash himself, but he and the church are using a faked story as a faith promoting story in order to convert people to that organization and to retain the faith of the members, who pay 10% of their income as tithing.
Technically, it may not plastered on a “Contribute to the Lord!” glossy brochure, but the effect is similar.
Certainly, churches and bogus charities use false stories to solicit money. That’s not a news flash. However, this is a case where they are promoting a fake veteran, which is where is where it is a concern to many.
Interestingly, this is a mere blip, where the most famous Mormon who clearly profited from his stolen valor is Paul Dunn, formerly one of the top leaders in the church. His fabricated stories of miraculous divine intervention directly saving him from machine gun bullets which tore off his belt and split his helmet.
This is from a blog made shortly after the Manti Te’o story came out
This is part of the Mormon culture. To tell faith promoting stories demonstrating the active divine intervention of God in our lives.
I grew up in the era where Paul Dunn was king. His speaker tapes and books sold well. The teacher in my missionary prep class used to play Dunn’s tapes and told us to buy some as useful tools for converting people to Mormonism, as it invoked powerful emotional responses which missionaries explained was the spirit of God testifying to the investigator the truth of the Mormon church.
There simply is no doubt that Dunn is guilty of stolen valor. Not in the strict legal sense, perhaps, but certainly by how veterans would see it.
After Dunn was exposed, he sort of wiggles around for a while before giving a half-assed apology. The Mormon Church retired him but continued to sell his books and tapes through the church owned bookstore.
Here, again, we have a(n apparently popular) Mormon leader saying he is a veteran. Here, again, are some fantastic claims of divine intervention. The exact details differ. It looks like this guy hasn’t made any speaker tapes or books, but his story is being utilized by the Mormon Church for the same purpose.
The stolen valor here is from the man and his church, which as I noted has not pulled his picture from their site.
You yourself don’t get upset by that. Fine. Whatever. We don’t all get upset about same things.
Jules: Man, I just been sitting here thinking.
Vincent: About what?
Jules: About the miracle we just witnessed.
Vincent: The miracle you witnessed. I witnessed a freak occurrence.
Jules: What is a miracle, Vincent?
Vincent: An act of God.
Jules: And what’s an act of God?
Vincent: When God makes the impossible possible. But this morning, I don’t think it qualifies.
Jules: Hey, Vincent, don’t you see? That shit don’t matter. You’re judging this shit the wrong way. I mean, it could be that God stopped the bullets, or He changed Coke to Pepsi, He found my fucking car keys. You don’t judge shit like this based on merit. Now, whether or not what we experienced was an “according to Hoyle” miracle is insignificant. What is significant is that I felt the touch of God. God got involved.