Just a quick question, according to the Webster’s definition of an island (ie, smaller than a continent), well, where does that leave Australia? I live here, and there’s a saying that goes “Australia is the world’s smallest continent, but world’s largest island”… which obviously isn’t right according to Mr Webster, but I was just wondering if it’s true or not.
There was a thread on this back in February. (Sorry, but I don’t know how to link to threads.) The gist of the argument was – if it sits on a continental plate, then by golly, it’s a continent! Arbitrary, perhaps, but then, so is every other definition that we bandied about.
Well, I know how to use the Search function, and I can’t find it, either. Do you have any idea how many threads there are with the word “continent” in them? Lots.
Anyway.
So you have the sense of a big contiguous land mass.
So the difference between an island and a continent is a purely arbitrary “size” thing.
Australia is frequently referred to as the Island Continent, but I think that’s more in reference to its separation from any other large land masses, than to any particular “island-ness”.
I don’t think that the definition of “continent” has anything to do with “a continent is on a tectonic plate and an island isn’t”, because, for one thing, Vancouver Island is on the Juan De Fuca Plate.
And in a certain sense, all land on Earth is resting on a tectonic plate somewhere. Iceland is split in half. One part rests on the North American plate, the other part is on the Eurasian Plate.