Or am I a totally expansionist fuck?
You’re a “totally expansionist fuck [sic].”
Glad I could help.
Answer #1:
Given your behavior in some of the other Pit threads you’ve been in, I would remove the word “expansionist” and replace it with the derogatory reference to low intelligence of your choice, and the answer will become yes.
Answer #2:
This has been debated to a certain extent in another Pit thread. It’s a long one, and some of the posts in it may have awfully big words for you, but if you feel up to reading it, I highly recommend it.
Yes
No mispelling here; why did you say sic?
I wouldn’t use the word “expansionist.” Unless, of course, you think we should turn Afghanistan into an American colony after defeating it. That’s what expansionism is, after all.
The word I’d use would be “overzealous.” Considering that the zealotry of others created this situation in the first place, that’s not a good thing.
The way I read it you are a fuck.
The words preceding “fuck” both modify the word “fuck”. I.e. you are a total fuck and you are an expansionist fuck.
Coincidentally you are also a pin-headed fuck, a gigantic fuck, a rassin’ frassin’ fuck, a pain in the ass fuck, a fuckity fuck fuck and a useless excuse for a fuck – all wrapped up into one.
So go fuck yourself.
Hey man, I enjoy fucking and would appreciate it if you wouldn’t sully the good word on this scum.
newzucanuze, you are totally and expansionist jerkwad.
“sic: A parenthetical insertion used in printing quotations or reported utterances to call attention to something anomalous or erroneous in the original, or to guard against the supposition of misquotation. Also as n., an instance of ‘sic’.”
-from the OED online, a site to which all decent human beings should subscribe.
And since we’re at it:
"Jingo: 3. A nickname for those who supported and lauded the policy of Lord Beaconsfield in sending a British fleet into Turkish waters to resist the advance of Russia in 1878; hence, one who brags of his country's preparedness for fight, and generally advocates or favours a bellicose policy in dealing with foreign powers; a blustering or blatant ‘patriot’; a Chauvinist.
Quotes:
1878 G. J. HOLYOAKE in Daily News 13 Mar. 3/4 The Jingoes in the Park. Ibid., The Jingoesthe new tribe of music hall patriots who sing the jingo song. 1879 Truth 22 May, The Jingoes ought to rejoice and be glad that their ‘tall talk’ did not drive us into a war with Russia last year. 1880 G. DUFF in 19th Cent. Apr. 667 Our interest in Russia is that the Muscovite Jingoes should learn a little more geography. 1881 Gentl. Mag. Jan. 46 The Jingo is the aggregation of the bully. An individual may be a bully; but, in order to create Jingoism, there must be a crowd. 1897 LD. SALISBURY in Times 19 Jan., A well-working arbitration system would be an invaluable bulwark to defend the Minister from the jingoes. 1898 Times 18 Jan. 6/1 (N.Y. Corresp.) A school of politicians…who, like the jingoes, are apt to use the word American aggressively, as the jingoes do.
"
-also from OED online.
I would say no, because the implication here is that jingoes are jackasses who are only interested in their own position. That seems to be the the indentity we’re all trying to avoid (as I think you might have noticed if you’ve been paying attention to the news or reading the posts here). But please, jackass, I mean jingo, away if you must.