Israel's tacticial situation

Did he also mentioned, that four years later few remaining Jews rounded up in Warsaw ghetto were send by trains to Auschwitz?

War in 1939 was relatively nice. It was 1940 when they started to kill civilians and 1942 when they started full scale “final solution” - including killing POWs.

Which they aren’t necessarily able to do. The infrastructure has been targeted, and it’s quite widely reported that moving within Lebanon has become very difficult, and even more so in southern Lebanon. This has been a major problem, for instance, for the evacuation of foreigners living in this area.

An article I read yesterday reported about some village in southern Lebanon where such leaflets have been dropped. problem is : the main road has been destroyed, and vehicles using the secondary one are destroyed because it passes close to Hezbollah positions and a strategic location. IOW the population is warned to evacuate and prevented from doing so, or targeted if it tries.

Israel refused to open a safe corridor for the evacuation of civilians and/or foreigners. Telling people to get out in such conditions is quite hypocritical.

No, he did not, he did not talk about such things much.

I often wondered how he survived.

I know it sounds crazy, but the place is not very large, people can walk out.

  • the distances are minute, even by UK standards.

My understanding is that the Israelis are targetting anything that looks as if it is carrying Katyushas into or out of the South.

To me it is astonishing how many people have /not/ been killed

Incidentally I am not entirely sure what the contrived UK furore about Bunker Busters being shipped via Scotland is all about, someone is broadcasting signals.

Reverting to the precise topic. ‘Israel’s Tactical Situation’

I have decided to delete the rest of my post, I think I can see what is going on.

The trap is about to shut.

Why did Israel BOMB the UN observer post? Supposedly, the UN informed Israel of bombs being dropped "real close’-yet the Israeli killed 4 UN observers-what sense does this make? Of course, I have no idea just what these guys are supposed to do-tell people there is a war on?

I vaguely recall years ago reading an article from some sci-fi author ( Niven ? ), where he mentions some engineer who frequented sci-fi conventions being referred to jokingly as a “nuclear power” because he built his own Titan missle in his back yard.

Well, here’s one possibility : Link

Perhaps they want to drive out any UN observers. As far as why they would want that, from the same article :

Massacre time !

not me read #153

Larry Niven: Fallen Angle.

…which was a direct follow up on your previous post: In ww2 Germany bombed London daily. Did it make them quit. Hell no it gave them more reason to resist. It does not work. Honest negotiations are the only chance.

Fallen Angel was a novel ( which I never read ), not an article, although he might have based a character on/mentioned the real guy in the novel.

Re Israel’s (and the US’s) strategic situation after this is all over, some quotes from a highly intelligent Mideast-oriented blog, **Syria Comment **:

All this, and Iran gets to develop its nukes without any interference because of the diversion of this war. So, as I observed way back at the beginning of this thread, in a few years we’ll probably be treated to the spectacle of the world’s very first nuclear exchange, between Iran and Israel. Wotta treat that’ll be, eh?

Might just as likely be Pakistan/India. Maybe even more likely.

This is the truth of it
fighting leads to killing and killin gleads to warring
and that was damn near the death of us all
Look at us now all busted up
and everyone talking about hard rain
but we learned from the dust of them all
when it happens here it finishes here
2 men enter 1 man leave
ladies and gentlemen boys and girls
dying time is here

We play at our little wars and devalue human life. Someday we all pay. bigtime. in 30 years they all will have nukes, then it would be too late to make peace.

Here are two hypotheses.

  1. Israel doesn’t want human rights observers in certain areas. Source: the posterior of some poster on the internet.

  2. Hezbollah was using UN post as ‘shield’: Just last week, Maj. Hess-von Kruedener wrote an e-mail about his experiences after nine months in the area, words Maj.-Gen. MacKenzie said are an obvious allusion to Hezbollah tactics.
    “What I can tell you is this,” he wrote in an e-mail to CTV dated July 18. "We have on a daily basis had numerous occasions where our position has come under direct or indirect fire from both (Israeli) artillery and aerial bombing.

“The closest artillery has landed within 2 meters (sic) of our position and the closest 1000 lb aerial bomb has landed 100 meters (sic) from our patrol base. This has not been deliberate targeting, but rather due to tactical necessity.”

Those words, particularly the last sentence, are not-so-veiled language indicating Israeli strikes were aimed at Hezbollah targets near the post, said Maj.-Gen. MacKenzie.

“What that means is, in plain English, 'We’ve got Hezbollah fighters running around in our positions, taking our positions here and then using us for shields and then engaging the (Israeli Defence Forces),” he said.

That would mean Hezbollah was purposely setting up near the UN post, he added. …
The e-mail appears to contradict the UN’s claim there had been no Hezbollah activity in the vicinity of the strike.

Ack! Sorry Der Trihs: I had not read your post when I wrote this. I was not trying to dig at anyone either: I simply couldn’t remember where I had seen the allegation.