No, there are a lot of people here educated in other countries.
I don’t know if authentically is the right word: perhaps more freely.
With all that you’ve gotten wrong so far, you’d think that you would have at least learned not to “suppose” so much.
There’s a really simple solution to this one. Stop dwelling on it.
You’ve been provided the definition of atheism a dozen times.
You ought to know that it is independent of the scientific method or logic.
One sure doesn’t have to be brilliant to be an attorney, but I’m confident that one cannot be as grossly stupid as pchaos and be one.
I don’t mod The Pit, so I’m just speaking as a poster when I suggest nobody argue with pchaos as atheism in this thread. There are probably 20 pages of other posts about that. This is a Pitting, so just tell him how stupid and whiny he’s being and what a miserable failure all of his arguments are.
That’s what you would like to believe. But non-atheists believe the same thing about their own world views also. Because I pray, I have a continuing dialogue with God and I am better able to respond to the demands of life.
If I believed in God, I’d feel bad he has to listen to you all the time. I’ve only had to listen to your bullshit for a couple of weeks and I can’t imagine a lifetime or an eternity of absorbing that kind of stupidity.
You are stupid and whiny and a miserable failure.
So wait, you believe in God, but if atheists could convince you that they could offer you a better deal, you’d switch to NOT believing in God, just like that? And so, you’re gonna stick with the God thing, because eh, too much thinking involved in being an atheist?
snerk
Spoons and Muffin also, I believe.
what the fuck is a ‘non-athiest’ ?
ANd I never said that they didn’t believe …
You know what - never mind - my post stands and you continue to prove that you are unwilling or unable to ‘get it’
I’m a pretty feeble debator, as I take too long to formulate posts for someplace as fast as the SD… but I do think I’m a good judge of character and intent. Pchaos may/may not be a lawyer…seems unlikely, but his confusing use of language even stumps me!!
Its almost like Internet Aspbergers syndrome takes over…the liens…haha typo lines get drawn over some miniscule definition of disagreement… and the discussion just loses any focus.
Not responding to trolling behavior is almost as hard as responding is.:rolleyes:
You are a sad, broken little toy, aren’t you. :rolleyes:
Correct, and have never claimed to be such. I’m a helluva good cook, though.
And just exactly what color IS the sky in your world?
So what I hear you saying is… pchaos is just another reason to doubt the existence of a (benevolent) god. Compelling.
Clearly his faith is weak and wavering, so, like the anti-gay-rights crusaders who cannot stay out of the men’s room at the park, he is continuously flirting with atheism before righteously returning to his church, telling himself it is not for him.
Not really. He is so logically incomprehensible that at best he can be used to show that religion can possibly lead to brain damage.
No, the problem is people who actually believe they’re getting legitimate legal advice from an anonymous internet message board.
You want legal advice? Go to a lawyer. You want a hack (or twelve) pretneding to be a lawyer? Ask your question on this forum.
Well, that’s logic for ya.
I don’t buy the German Shepherd bit, either.
Thinking on it, I guess he could be even more Deceptive by only Deceiving part time and telling the truth when it could lead to further Deception later. That’s some deep thinking on his handle.