It's an internet message board, not a freaking book!

[duffer]

@astro

[sub]
Read this you weasels. Oh that’s right you can’t becuase it’s just too tiny. Far, far too tiny for your limited eyes, so essentially I can say anything I want. Yeah baby, I’m looking at you. That’s a big pair you’re smuggling in that blouse. [/sub]

Now that’s just silly.

[FilmGeek]

@astro

Read this you weasels. Oh that’s right you can’t becuase it’s just too tiny. Far, far too tiny for your limited eyes, so essentially I can say anything I want. Yeah baby, I’m looking at you. That’s a big pair you’re smuggling in that blouse.

I saw that.

[erislover]

Fad? You mean making explanations free of messy qualifiers so that they are consise without sacrificing accuracy? Yeah, that sucks. I liked it better when it took fifteen points to tease out one nitpicky point because someone didn’t just make an endnote to the post explaining a particular thing in more detail than was really necessary for most people. Conversations are better when you try to avoid clarity.

[Cisco]

@Reeder

It only works on IE.

Works a lot better in Opera. Can go from 20% to 1000%

[Ashkicker]

@Dog80

This new fad* is really annoying.

I guess this will really bother you.

[AngelicGemma]

@astro

[sub]
Read this you weasels. Oh that’s right you can’t becuase it’s just too tiny. Far, far too tiny for your limited eyes, so essentially I can say anything I want. Yeah baby, I’m looking at you. That’s a big pair you’re smuggling in that blouse. [/sub]

My eyes!!! My eyes!!! :eek:

[grey_ideas]

@Cisco

Works a lot better in Opera. Can go from 20% to 1000%

Yeah, just don’t do as stpauler suggested and hold the ctrl button and scroll down with Opera…text gets really tiny!

Could just be the way I’ve got it set up though.

grey_ideas