Popularizing a quote is not the same thing as creating it. Safire coined the phrase, Agnew popularized it.
And yes, if you’ll recall, I saidin the post currently under discussion that in response to the nattering nabobs of hysteria, Penn State has been shamelessly scapegoating Joe Paterno in a cowardly attempt to cover its own ass.
No, the context was that Penn State has been cowering to the nattering nabobs. (Why is it that so many of you are unable to comprehend words in front of your very eyes?)
I don’t recall any nabobs being factually wrong about Safire, and there’s certainly no evidence to date that they are right about Paterno. So, one out of three ain’t good.
The fact that you are attempting to convince others (with pitiful results) does not negate that they **are **giving convincing evidence and rhetoric that there was a coverup, and there can be cowering also after, it does not exclude the coverup at all but your silly mind thinks that it should.
I’ll have to deal with all that Safire stuff later as I have an excellent American Masters documentary on Woody Allen to watch, but there’s not a word of factual evidence anywhere in that post to indict Joe Paterno. It’s all opinion and supposition, nothing more.
What REALLY sickens me, Starving Artist, is that you’re more upset about Joe Paterno’s problems than those of the victims. None of this “wait until we have more of the facts”, blah blah blah. How much more do you need? Photographs? Video recordings?
Joe Paterno is an enabler. Adults in power are enablers. Coaches. Priests. Boy Scout Troop Leaders. Joe Paterno is not some innocent pixie-man who lives within a hazy cloud of innocence and athletic purity.
He is an adult. He is and was completely aware of his surroundings and the circumstances of his subordinates. To deny the fact that by (in)action Joe Paterno enabled this entire perversion is quite sad.
The construct of his existence at State College, PA relied upon this never coming to light. It did. He’s through.
Being an enabler is a moral problem. In this case, on a grand scale.
ETA: Saw Guin’s post on preview. Oh, wait, there are victims?? I thought this thread was about the terrible awful things being said about Sandusky and Paterno, those two poor misunderstood fellahs. You mean to say there are actual victims? Like, little boys who were fucked in the ass for years and are now held silent by the powers of the Penn State University? Really?
He reminds me of that jackoff that showed up in GD a while back with all his “evidence” that the holocaust never happened. Like SA, that idiot holocaust denier declared that "it’s not about emotions, it’s about FACTS’…then, just like SA went on to ignore every single fact that didn’t support his deranged, factually incorrect theory. He was also certain that HE was the voice of reason, while everyone else was hysterical! I’m not sure if it’s denial, sociopathy or some other mental disorder (is there a psychiatrist in the house?), but his prim, pompous, know-it-all attitude is hilarious, especially when you read his posts in Church Lady’s voice…which I always do
“Standing” is a legal term, which we’ve determined you have no business using. Your pseudo-lawyering aside, the minimal requirements of the reporting law (which Paterno arguably met) are not a ceiling or cap on what he morally could and should have done, nor (as you persistently imply) a prohibition against his doing more or a better job of effectuating a real investigation. Everyone “by law” has standing to call any police agency that will listen when they have credible information that a serious crime has been permitted, and everyone “by law” is perfectly entitled (has “standing”) to confront the person accused. If someone told me my son was shooting out the windows of his high school last night with a BB gun, I would not be morally or legally limited by lack of “standing” to reporting it to his principal but never bringing it up with him. Of course because I know him and have a relationship with him I am going to ask him “what’s the deal, were you down there with your BB gun like the guy said?” Nor would I be as stupidly baffled as you seem to purport you would be (due to lack of “training”) to conduct a pretty effective practical cross examination (including follow-up questioning if he initially said “No, I dunno what you’re talking about” – a denial which you pretend would unavoidably end the inquiry) that would give me a pretty good basis, I’m confident, for deciding whether and how much to escalate the matter.
Wish Paterno had done a little covering of the asses of the little boys involved. But he didn’t, 'cause he’s either a doddering fool or a self-interested prick. But certainly not a “good man,” in this instance.
The most parsimonious explanation is that he is a troll, pure and simple. He has yet to be swayed by a single argument or cite here, right? So why the fuck continue to engage him? In the end trolls and true believers end up becoming one and the same anyway, at least in purely practical terms.
It’s been years since I got trained on this, but I recall that a ‘mandated reporter’ (like a school employee) was required to report to legal authorities (police or County Attorney). Just reporting to your supervisor was specifically mentioned as NOT enough to cover your legal responsibilities. (Probably enacted because they often have an incentive to keep the whole situation quiet – which seems to be what happened at Penn State.)
Perhaps Pennsylvania law is different than Minnesota law on this.
In Pennsylvania, does passing the buck to your supervisor meet the legal requirements of reporting this?
It seems to have escaped your attention - probably because the miscreant is non other than yourself - but the person in this thread who’s been talking the most about how other posters can’t let it go when someone is wrong on the internet keeps coming back to it himself, even to the point of poking his adversaries with false accusations of trolling in an obvious attempt either to see his side have the last word, or to jump start the thread in hopes of keeping it going.
As for me, my computer is on the fritz and until I can find out what’s wrong with it and get it fixed I’m having to post via my iPod touch, which is slow, cumbersome and awkward when it comes to the coding and posting which threads like this require.
Still, to get back to the OP, has anybody else noticed that Joe Paterno, in yet another example of self-sacrifice and love for Penn State, has donated an additional $100,000 to the university even after his firing, when what he should have done was to proclaim forcefully that he had done absolutely nothing wrong, was not going to retire, and would sue for his job back if fired. But no, his sense if integrity and his love for Penn State caused him instead to fall on his sword in an attempt to do what was best for the university, and to continue to support it financially even after being outrageously scapegoated by that selfsame university. What a guy!
Has anybody noticed that Paterno, who is dying of cancer and feels horrible regret for covering up a child molestation scandal for so long, has suddenly decided to assuage his guilty conscience by donating $100k to Penn State at the same time protecting this money from potential lawsuits from the victims? What a guy!
And while we’re on the subject, cite that Paterno covered up child molestation. I would bet that you can’t do it but that would be like betting that water is wet.
I should feel guilty, but I’m chortling instead. I am just so tickled by the mental gymnastics needed to maintain Paterno’s sainthood. Honestly, I would pay ‘five bucks per refresh’ for entertainment like this.