Those were the only points SA could come up with.
And I vote “yes” on the pennlive question.
Don’t know if that is wholly legit. I hold SA responsible for the bilious crap he spews here, what he spews elsewhere is none of my concern. I vote shrug.
If you truly find these, I’m happy to analyze and judge. I’m would guess F-P will do the same so you have for and against biases represented. I’m mostly interested in the extremes because there is less gray area for interpretation - so just start with the lies.
Yeah, I’d hate for someone to notice a curious similarity between my posts and those of a certain bieberLuvr_6969 on a certain other message board…
Yeah. Seconded. Starving Artist could you please stop tap-dancing around, man up, and just answer the fucking question with a straight Yes or No answer? Please?
WRONG. That’s a myth.
Wait, Starving Artist is a high school drop-out? That explains a LOT.
(No offense to drop-outs, necessarily, but considering he acts like an expert on most things, particularly history, I find that hilarious)
Quite honestly? With all this dicking around, I’m guessing he IS the poster over there. And he’s too much of a coward to say so. I say let’s just act as if he is. If he has a problem with it, let him speak up.
WRONG.
Mankind existed for many tens of thousands of years before the Middle Ages, you know.
Hardly! Who said I was a high-school dropout? Have you been listenibg to Huerta again, or perhaps taking some other doofus’ insult too seriously?
Ya know, Guin, for some odd, inexplicable reason I find myself kind of liking you and kind of feeling sorry for you at the same time, so I generally tend to go easy on you despite the fact that you are often so eager to say and believe the worst about me. I detect a sensitive and good heart beneath your often foul bluster, and I think you come in for a fair amount of undeserved abuse, both here and on a certain other board. If you’ll recall, I was even kind enough at one point to flatter you, after seeing one of your photos, as looking like Tori Amos. And this despite the fact that you’ve been hurling vile, obscene and faux-intellectually superior insults my way for years. I did not have to do that, but I did because I kind of like you and kind of feel sorry for you and I thought the compliment would do you good. But I have to say, sometimes (often in fact) you do test my resolve not to be mean to you.
Now, having said that, I notice you haven’t been vomiting lately. Are you feeling all right?
It’s ever so kind of you to only be a dick to somebody some of the time.
I’ll agree with elucidator on this. What Starving Artist may or may not have posted in another thread on another board is irrelevant to this thread and to this board. While I’ll admit that his tapdancing about the question is mildly amusing, it’s not like admitting it is going to make him seem any worse than he already does.
(And why am I back in this thread again? Well, I’l tell you. The film The Last King of Scotland is turning out to be far less interesting than I expected.)
Yes that’s when he started pussyfooting around and speaking in code. Given that he is a graduate of the 6th grade, I don’t think he’s dumb enough to outright deny he wrote the PennLive posts. By neither confirming nor denying it, he can still say “well I never said it wasn’t me” when confronted with irrefutable evidence.
You can’t look away. It happens to the best of us 
We thought you might have been speaking in some sort of code.
I’m rarely a dick to anyone who hasn’t been a dick to me first, and even then I’m often still not as dickish as they are. And frankly, I only appear to be a dick in the first place because so many people are dicks to me. 
Seriously. What people see is twenty different people being dicks to me, and then when I’m a dick back all they see is me being twenty times as dickish as anyone else. But, them’s the breaks when you determine to give as good as you get.
Yes. And the development of the theory of a spherical Earth began about 660 BCE, and Aristotle pretty much proved it in about 330 BCE. The rest was just testing and refinement, pretty much like what’s been going on with the theory of evolution lately.
The “tens of thousands” of years that you refer to were prehistorical, precivilization, and prescientific. I recognize that you have emotional reasons for desiring that we return to those days, but I’ll pass.
Haven’t enough time to wait for that, doctor says I have at most forty more years to live.
Dear PennLive suspicionaries,
There is no code, there is no secret message. All you have to do is look at what the PennLive poster has said and compare it with what I’ve been saying, and if you are astute and you’ve been paying attention you will have the answer you seek. Frankly, I’m surprised no one has figured it out yet. Perhaps I’ve bought into the “smartest message board” meme a tad more heavily than warranted.
Disappointedly yours,
SA
Malkovich.
That’s a YES 
Now you might want to ask him why he adopted the persona of some guy from the UK, who probably doesn’t even know his name was being used there.
Actually fifty to a hundred years back would suit me fine, for apart from technological advances in electronics and medicine, and with all things considered, it was a vastly superior time.
But I digress. People have been tilling the soil and harvesting crops for at least ten thousand years and perhaps as many as twenty-five thousand years. Plus, the entire world didn’t wake up one morning, slap their heads and say, “Damn! That Aristotle, what a guy! How could I have been so stupid!? Looks like the world is round after all!” :smack:
All of which is beside the point because Guin’s cite was focused on the Middle Ages.
Really, you guys, this board is looking dummer and dummer…or at least the parts with you in 'em are.