Huerta88, it’s impressive how you’ve hit homerun after homerun in this thread, even though Starving Artist is a completely hopeless pitcher.
It’s a shame that Paterno won’t have to testify at Sandusky’s trial. I wonder if they’ll just read his Grand Jury testimony in full instead?
I think you mean Sandusky, not McQueary!
Apparently he can have almost infinite amounts of shit knocked out of him, and still keep generating more. If we could harness this we would solve any fertilizer shortages for the next thousand years.
Christ, this thread is boring. Given the pathetic and tortured lengths he’s gone to, I can only conclude that Starving Artist is a kid fucker, and is defending Paterno out of a sense of loyalty to the kid fucker brotherhood.
In the interest of accuracy, no one has accused Paterno of molesting boys himself, merely of not doing enough when he was told that someone else was molesting them.
Err, yeah, thanks for that catch.
Yeah, I know. But Starving Artist has convinced me that Paterno was not only a gleefully unrepentant pederast, but that he was a founding member of the Super Adventure Club and the first man to sodomise a child on the moon. And that’s why Starving Artist is defending him. Because kiddy-diddlers gotta stick together.
Hey, if logic and reason won’t do it, why not just make fun of him?
Correct, but one of the underlying rationales is that Paterno’s in the clear because Sandusky (a kid fucker) really didn’t do anything wrong, reports of “intercourse” with children should not be taken seriously and/or should be explained away by the “physical impossibility of raping a ten year old if you are tall” or by inventing any fact that will weigh against clear testimony of “intercourse,” or by arguing that absent anal intercourse, neither the perp. nor the reportee need really be very concerned or condemned.
And that is giving comfort and aid to the brotherhood of boy fuckers. If you look at enough cases of serial molestation, molesters absolutely love elaborate rationalizations by which it can be “shown” that what they’re doing, they’re not really doing, is fabricated because kids have overactive imaginations, is part of an evil plot to discredit them, is an act of innocent affection, is actually initiated by the victim (scumbag priest Paul Shanley once, IIRC, or rather more than once published or said something to the effect that, you know, in most so-called abuse cases, the child is actually the aggressor). The whole purpose of NAMBLA (for which this scumbag should be writing copy) is to promulgate lies about non-existent things such as “man boy love” as excuses for their foul desire to gain illicit sexual gratification by victimizing children. For my money, when SA praises to the skies everything Paterno ever did, including with Sandusky, he is (even apart from his separate disgusting did-I-just-see-that? defense of Sandusky, which took a good while to emerge but is now in full flower) enabling and encouraging molesters to think that there are theories available to them or which will be effective for them on which some forms of molestation aren’t really likely or worth pursuing with vigor.
The Starving Artistocrats!
But according to Starving Artist, one shouldn’t believe kids when they say they’re being molested, because most likely the kids are lying to get someone in trouble. Because it’ll wreck someone’s life!
But . . . but . . . wait – I don’t understand – they did not prove he anally raped her, they are just hysterically rushing to lynch mob judgment!!
Or, in the real world, adults who expose themselves to unrelated children in a sexualized context are routinely, just about uniformly, and quite rightly subjected to condemnation and prosecution.
What if he was just giving her parallel parking lessons. We don’t know.
As I’ve said before, I regard it as a sign my arguments are winning each time someone lies about something I’ve said because it proves they don’t have a substantive rebuttal and are therefore reduced to lying in order to manufacture a point they can win.
Unfortunately, as I’ve discovered in trying to contend with Huerta’s walls of lies, refuting each lie is time consuming and largely a waste of time because none of my opponents are interested in the truth anyway and are perfectly happy to regard Huerta’s Walls 'O Shit as “kicking my ass.”
Therefore I’ve decided that rather than waste time trying in good faith to rebut the lies my opponents are posting about what I’ve said/think/suppose, I’m simply going to post the word “Winning” after each lie. This way I won’t have to waste tons of time and verbiage trying set straight truths that no one is interested in anyway while still letting lurkers and intellectually honest posters know that what they’re reading is dishonest bullshit.
Okay? So, here we go…
Winning!
Worked for Charlie Sheen … why not?
You’re not going to make the slightest attempt to explain, specifically, what the lie is or why, in your view, it’s a lie? You’re just going to post the word “winning”?
Sure, yes, absolutely, do that. That’ll turn opinion right around, you bet.
Winning!
Winning!
Winning!
Winning!
Winning!
Winning!
So as we can see, virtually every word out of Huerta’s lying mind and keyboard is a lie.
Naturally I welcome Guin, Huerta or any other poster to challenge me on any comment that receives a “Winning!” by posting whatever it was I posted that backs up what they said. I predict crickets or other lies in support of the original lies myself.
What a truly pathetic display of being chronically unable to allow someone else the last word.
The police called. Your English Composition teacher is out on the ledge, threatening to jump.
Why should I have to spend all my time on the defensive, explaining over and over that I didn’t say what the lying liars who lie are saying about what I’ve written? Let them back up their words. It should be easy enough if they’re telling the truth.
Besides, virtually no one posting in this thread has the slightest interest in truth anyway, as the humongous amount of time I’ve already devoted to debunking lies has been roundly ignored while even more lies are cheered. So, let the assholes back up their lies, I say. Again, what they’ve said should be easy enough to back up if they’re telling the truth.