Mmm… Rum-filled chocolate covered cherries…
(just trying to get us off Page 69 as soon as possible)
If you’re reading this, post something. Thanks.
No one may have noticed had you not mentioned it. And yes, it is possible that might prompt a surge of juvenile japes, but we are far too mature and proper a crowd to descend to such. Wait, Vinny isn’t here, right?
As of now, he’s posted 423 times in this thread for 12.3% of all responses.
You’ll also be unsurprised to find Huerta88 at 378 or 11% of the total; however, Starving does beat the combined total of #3-#6.
I clock in at a whopping 14, including this post. Sometimes I feel that’s about a dozen responses more than was necessary.
I know my total is 2.5 responses that actually got through to SA, and a couple dozen that were pointless.
Well, unless they helped others here deal with a tragic event, and persistent ignorance here (both hard on the emotional health).
When I first read this, I saw it as “a surge of juvenile rapes”, and I thought “He didn’t really go there, did he?”
Our friend goes a number of places he shouldn’t, but that, most assuredly, is not one of them.
Um… is this a fair description of the event? “Vague, ill-defined activity that they presumed to be sexual?” Really? That’s the best, most fair-minded way to described what he saw?
Now you’ve done it. I hope you’re prepared for a treatise on rhytmic slapping sounds, the strain of 60 year old thigh muscles and cardboard toilet paper tubes.
The internet is a series of interconnected toilet paper tubes.
Welcome to the jungle Bricker, we’ve got fun and games.
Feel free to stick around and call this loon out on his (tirelessly) repetitive ritual of inventing evidence that is 180 degrees at odds with the only, you know, evidence.
Maybe explain to him the concept of what a “witness” is and why he doesn’t get to be one.
Perhaps point out that the only eyewitness’s testimony has consistently been to seeing “intercourse” from six feet away.
And for God’s sake if “due process” comes up again, can I tap out and let you handle that?
Hmm. Can you work in some “liberal hypocrisy” angle? Gotta use the right bait.
I hope you packed a lunch.
Went to New York City, once. Nope. Nope nope nope.
Remember the good old days when we were allowed to just draw up a lawnchair and make popcorn? I miss those days.
:settles in on the couch::
:eats pita and tzatziki:
: offers some to Bricker, in case he forgot his lunch::
Paper towel tubes.
Winning!
One more post and we will be off of page 69…
ETA: That did it!
Oh please.
Welcome to the jungle, we’ve got what it takes.
The coach says it was steamy fun
But it’s statutory rape.
Well we’ve got salacious quotes
An’ old men screwing goatze
Sandusky gonna cop a plea, and then that’s just all she wrote !
Oh the jungle, welcome to the jungle, where We Are Penn State.
( Apologies to Axel Rose. Who is a fucking saint next to the staff of that Athletic Department… )
Anyone ever notice how the number ‘70’ kinda looks like an older guy bumping up against a ten-year-old kid’s butt?
Shut up, you, or SA will come in again with his paper towel roll to prove this can only be page 11. Perfectly innocent, you know.
Let’s review that “proof” for old times sake:
SA: Consider the experiment in which you take a paper towel tube…
the internet: Uh, ok, we’ve considered it
SA: I just proved it was impossible
the internet: Uh, you did? When?
SA:When I told you to consider that experiment. I’ve shown it was impossible.
the internet: Shouldn’t your proof involve more than pure speculation, like maybe actually trying the experiment?
SA:You are all like Nancy Grace
the internet: Uh, ok.