Why you bumpers are &%%!
:mad::smack::mad::smack::mad:
Ok, I’m calm now…
Would it be hard for management to close this with a note to go to a new thread now focused on the trial?
Thanks in advice.
bumper(s)?
Other than the fact that the information came out as a result of the trial, my post had nothing to do with Sandusky, per se, and everything to do with what Paterno and other Penn State officials knew (and possibly lied repeatedly about). This thread is the appropriate place to put it and, in fact, it would have been a hijack in a Sandusky-focused thread. So kiss my ass, a’ight?
Since I was referring to all the past ones that bumped the thread before, you are just getting butt hurt for nothing. 
R. P. McMurphy is the one I was referring to in this latest bumping incident, anyone that quickly follows is not in my complaint.
Maybe you ought to look at my posting history. First, the news was out there for two days before I even started the thread. I haven’t added to the thread in I don’t know how long (months?). The trial just started and new information that is very damning is coming out that directly pertains to the Pitting.
If you don’t like the fuckin’ thread don’t read the fuckin’ thread. I Pit you.
The best part of the linked story is that they blurred out the face of the witness…in a sketch. Talk about protecting anonymity.
And yes, I think it’s reasonable to assume that Paterno and others knew more about Sandusky than they let on. McQueary was very blunt with his description of what he saw…there’s not a lot of wiggle room.
I’m going to say this as delicately as possible: will you please shut the fuck up?
Why the fuck would mgmt do that? We’ve got this thread. If people post in it, then it’s still alive. If they don’t then it’s not.
How fucking hard of a concept is that to understand?
Simple history, this thread has been hijacked, unpasteurized and fucked with a cardboard tube, the recommendation is to open a new thread and link to this one with the note that it was indeed hijacked, trashed and there is no need to call the pedo trolls that “contributed” to the thread with the bump.
The people that are posting in this thread clearly don’t share your opinion.
If you want to avoid a thread, it’s simple, avoid it.
If you want to open a new thread, it’s simple, open one.
But assuming you know what’s best for everyone else, and getting annoyed because people are posting in a thread you don’t want them posting in is odd.
Even more
Many have already posted the same observation I have made even in this thread and elsewhere, even in a GD thread The Man With The Golden Gun made a dig at the need to kill it because of the sickness the pedo defenders brought in, so I’m just saying, whatever lifts your boat I say, and I’m only mostly joking like Autolycus (I wonder why he did not get any grief.)
So Meh.
- Your posts (initial and then clarification that you were specifically complaining about R.P.) indicate you think you just get to declare which threads stay open and which ones close.
Nobody put you in charge of the SDMB. I would never be so presumptuous as to think that I get to dictate which threads other people participate in, why do you think it’s ok for you to do that?
-
So other people are unable to avoid threads also, that’s your argument?
-
In that post, Auto didn’t presume that he/she speaks for the entire board and request that the thread gets closed.
Meh.
The point, as if there was any need to clarify it, is that you are like Lady Vanderbilt that is going to the punch bowl even after noticing that a turd is on it; so once again, whatever floats your boat, you are free to continue with the train-wreck…
That’s what Sandusky said! Badoom tish!
Too soon?
Whether you think there is value in keeping the thread open is irrelevant to the posters that do think there is value.
Here is a question for you:
Do you think it’s reasonable for you to assume that your subjective analysis trumps all other subjective analysis?
No, as I already mentioned it, so the remaining question is:
Don’t you think replying to the one that told you already that this is not important and you should continue with the wreck of being a little bit silly?
Back attcha:
You give the big “meh”. (http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=meh)
Then you spend your time reading and responding. WTF? I guess we should revise the Urban Dictionary to define “meh” as something someone says who really does care but says they don’t.
Don’t you have anything better to do, like take a shower in the player’s locker room?
Well, let me put it this way, if you insist on getting a concession from someone that already offered one, then the problem is you for continuing to demand it.
In other words, if you are not willing to continue with the pit at hand it is more clear that you have nothing much of a reason to continue then. And you are here just annoyed at the ones pointing only that the pedo trolls already left a huge turd in the bowl, I’m just saying: be my guest and continue drinking from it, I have other more important issues with racists right now in another thread.
I knew it. I knew you couldn’t let it go. You wasted more of your time.
Nope, just replied to the other thread, I will just spend a few seconds to point out that you better get going with the drinking, so keep up the bat signal up for the pedo defenders like SA
I am the Kwisatz Haderach.
But friends, please, there is no need to squabble. We are all wasting time equally here.
okay I came here as I googled how a 6’3" man with his arm around said boy with his hands up against wall can bugger a small ten year old? Despite that this kind of horsing around is not appropriate, it isnt illegal . Being caught is that position would cause most men to be stunned and a need to clarify what was going on. That being said the whole story being swept away gives cause to believe perhaps more was going on but does not prove or dispell the myth. As in all highly charged sex abuse cases the rampant need to judge like in the McMartin case is society’s need at large to condemn before facts are given. Prurient and sideshow antics facilitate guilt by association, hence the mob wants to distant themselves by repudiating the possibility of innocence,so in fact not wanting to be complicit in the act themselves. We might as well Pin a large M on Sandusky as did the mob in the Scarlet letter pinned an A on that poor woman. It seems that we have regressed and succumbed to mob mentality due more to instant information whether fact or hypothesis. In so many books written before the age of information we were warned not to do this as it will lead us down a path that will lead us into chaos and the Information Dessiminators contolling our every thought. The law will prevail as it is by nature unbiased however we are a community of men that hail from the dark ages of Inquisitions that I thought were far behind us.