Seriously guys, come on. Pick up the pace. I was hoping we’d be at least to 7000 posts by now.
Did you try to fit that raccoon into a paper towel tube, while squatting with it and your dick 2 feet above the floor? Unless you did, you may not be able to maintain that position long enough for it to amount to an insult to ‘raccoons everywhere’.
What do you take me for? A braggart? :dubious:
All I need is a toilet paper tube. 
And death.
Attorney General-elect Kathleen Kane has promised an investigation into Tom Corbett’s actions and decisions WRT his investigation of Sandusky. Of course, he’s saying that her investigation will be over in a matter of weeks because there’s nothing there. The more cynical among my friends think that Corbett was, in fact, holding back given the fact that his nose is pretty far up Penn State’s asshole.
There is also at least one billboard in Harrisburg asking how Freeh’s investigation and report could possibly be fair given that Paterno could not be interviewed because he was dead. This got a huge :rolleyes: from me on the basis that Paterno’s death could not be called inconvenient, exactly, because the man had lung cancer.
Ah, that Tom Corbett… what a space cadet…
Corbett clearly doesn’t understand investigations. The less there is to find, the longer the investigation will take, because the investigators will have to look ever farther and wider for the “evidence”, which can’t be proved not to exist.
Poor Jerry Sandusky. He feels the prison conditions he lives under are too harsh.
Since he’s in isolation, at least he’s not feeling much butthurt.
Sounds like he wants to be allowed to mingle with other prisoners.
Not a belief i’d want to test if I were him. (Hmm, maybe he’s just not used to showering by himself)
This made me wonder if his lawyers have given up, at least to a degree.
Jerry believes he’d be safe in the gen pop because he thinks stand-up rape is physically impossible.
I wonder where he would have gotten an idiotic idea like that?
Probably from someone who can’t read straight.
Success! Cats have catnip. Dogs have most anything that stinks. And Starving Artist can’t resist snapping at someone who points out that he said that it’s physically impossible (not just difficult, but literally not anatomically possible) for a ~6’3" person to have standing sex-from-behind with a person ~5’ or so.
Chances are that millions and millions of tall men (some of whom have helpfully filmed it and placed such videos all over the internet) have personal experience that refutes this. But Starving Artist isn’t affected by such trivial things as video evidence.
Hey, welcome back! Does your comment mean you’ve developed a sense of humor about yourself since last we heard from you? If so, congrats – it really does make life easier if you don’t take yourself so seriously.
And here are ten safe ways to have fun with Paper Towel Tubes!
Not possible without squatting, a position which wasn’t mentioned by McQueary.
Always had a sense of humor. Remember “Winning”? “Duh, duh, dut, dut, duh…I’m lovin’ it!”? 
It’s always fun showing you guys up. 
Yes it is, unless the definition of “squatting” is twisted so much as to include any bend of the knee at all.
We’ve already demonstrated to you that at least some people would consider a moderate knee-bend position (such as a that of a football linebacker, or a tall anal rapist) a “standing” position, even if you don’t consider it such. So, therefore, it’s very possible that Mike McQueary may have witnessed an anal rape (with a moderate knee bend), and called it “standing”.
Thank you for your time.
That was humor? I just thought it was the inane ramblings of a man who’s definition of “squatting” was so rigid that the idea that a even single person (say, Mike McQueary, for example) might have a slightly different definition was so shocking and damaging to his world-view and view-of-self that it must be fought with every fiber of his being.
Please, God, make it stop!
Nope. The average 4’ person’s anus would be about 24" off the ground. An average 6’3" man’s inseam would be about 36" with his penile attachment over the pubic bone being another inch or two above that, so approx. 38" off the ground. To anyone with the scarcest semblance of a brain, it should be obvious that to lower one’s peen 14" closer to the floor a bend in the knee considerably more than ‘slight’ would be required. What would be required is what most honest people would call a squat.
But as the Zimmerman thread has shown as well, when people are sufficiently wedded to a certain scenario so that they’re willing to ignore perfectly obvious facts and carry on as though those facts simply didn’t exist, they are perfectly capable of keeping up that charade for months.
Doesn’t change anything though. McQueary didn’t see a rape. Paterno wasn’t told of a rape. Paterno didn’t cover up a rape (that night or any other night). And no evidence exists to show that any of Penn State’s administrative officials did either.
So everyone at the beginning of the thread who said he/they did were wrong, and those of you who continue to cling to that claim now are wrong.
All of which, of course, makes me right.
13 of them, to be precise.