Dude, I’ve been mentally saying that while trying to parse your shit since your first post to this thread.
Exactly what I came here to post. The idea of providing a token of recognition for putting in the effort to stay with the team/club/organization regardless of how successful the group was or how significant your individual contribution is ubiquitous.
Folks that are all worked up about little kids getting trophies because the kids are losers are very confusing to me. Adolescence is tough enough without trying to make it even more like adulthood.
Parent issue is a big deal. This is how it went for me:
First achievement: Wow, you’re actually going to be a starter? We’re going to the game!
First First Place Trophy: Well, we’re going to put it on the TV so everybody can see!
5th: Batting champ is nice.
10th: Why do they keep giving you those things?
20th: Enough already, put them in your room.
30th: Nice ceremony, when are you going for a doctorate?
10 years later: You really gonna hold on to all this junk?
:rolleyes:
I think you’re reading a little too far into my statement. Bullies are going to exist no matter what current campaign exists to educate and eliminate them. So the old axiom about standing up to a bully no longer applies? When my son squares off against a kid that used to be one of the ones that picked on him and at least holds his own in a one-on-one drill, he earned grudging respect. Why? Because he’s out there getting his “dick knocked in the dirt” and “knocking other dicks into the dirt” as well.
I’m sorry if you can’t grok that these are kids and they are immature, but they do respect effort, sweat and a lack of intimidation, even if my son doesn’t have the athletic gifts that some of the others have. It’s good enough for him and for me, and it’s not like the entire team is made up of bullies, although anyone that knows football knows that unleashing a certain element of violence is how the game is played. This is the one place where my son “fails” in the football sense. He’s just too easygoing to ever be a great football player, and I’m fine with that too. I’m not one of the crazy parents screaming on the sidelines about their precious snowflake killing some other kid or needing more playing time, or even yelling at the refs.
And I also disagree that the introduction of competition at a young age is a bad thing. Life is competitive and always will be. The sooner kids learn that (along with your aforementioned life skills) the better they will be.
It’s not really rocket science. My “pussification” comment wasn’t intended to be at odds with the bully factor I mentioned, more a general statement about kids today in many respects (sports, academics, videogames, whatever) than a specific reference to the topic of football.
And no, I was not a middling athlete, I played WR for the Ohio State Buckeyes and used to return kicks for the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. It’s all on YouTube.
I believe the whole point is its not about the kids - its about the parents not being comfortable or competent at the tasks involved with cultivating winners.
It occurs to me that the military, which is kind of the ultimate in high-stakes competition, does something similar.
Even soldiers/sailors/airmen/marines who never actually see an enemy or leave the safety of a base/FOB will get campaign medals like the Global War on Terrorism medal for being part of the war. Hell, they even struck a “Army of Occupation” medal for award to military people who served in Germany or Japan AFTER the war for some specified period.
It doesn’t hurt anything, and certainly doesn’t confuse anyone who actually knows what a Bronze Star/DFC/Silver Star/DSC/Navy Medal/MOH looks like. Clearly the practice has some benefit, because militaries the world over have struck campaign and commemorative medals like this for a long, long time.
Giving little trophies to kids who were on the team, and who were essentially practice fodder for the better kids, or who filled roster slots and didn’t play much seems to be to be the exact same thing.
Also I want to throw in here that many examples are not traditionally team sports. If you are on the “golf” team or “bowling” team, it’s still about individuals needing to perform. Those not allowed to perform do not contribute to the single winners. In baseball, football, volleyball, and so forth, any minimal contribution (participation) results in a team win.
I grew up and still live in NYC. From the time my son was eight until he was about 20, he played in pickup baseball, football and basketball games. The teams did not always have the “official " number of participants” and the rules were sometimes modified to account for that. Maybe its a city vs suburb thing.
And regarding high school teams taking all comers - that depends on the school and the sport. Plenty of kids in my son’s high school didn’t make any baseball or basketball team ( not varsity, not JV, not freshman) but anyone who was interested was on the varsity bowling team.