Jerry Lewis: Comic Genius or Buffoon?

I happened to catch the original “Nutty Professor” on the tube last night and got to thinking about Jerry Lewis’s place in the comic pantheon. Suppposedly, the French think he’s a comic genius and hold him in incredibly high regard. “Nutty Professor” was pretty good (I particularly enjoy the introduction of Buddy Love and the making of the ‘Alaskan Polar Bear Heater’), “Cinderfella” has its momments (Fella coming down the stairs while Count Basie and His Orchestra swing in the background), and “The Ladies’ Man” is funny as well, but I think most of his early stuff with Dean Martin is too sappy.

What’s the verdict: Should Jerry Lewis have reached the heights, and if not, who should have the telethon every Labor Day weekend?

Buffoon. Particularly annoying buffoon, at that.

Just when we thought we were nearly done with Jerry Lewis, some sonofabitch clones him, and we have to suffer through Jim Carrey for the next goodness-knows-how-many years!

I saw this thread title and shuddered in terror. My mind immediately flashed back to my first Pit rant and I curled up underneath my desk and began sobbing.

Someone please make the world right for me.

I heard somewhere once that the reason Jerry Lewis was so popular in France was because, in the French dub of his movies, his part was played by a reknown French comic – who replaced Jerry’s whining voice with (supposedly) witty and cutting remarks instead. Anyone know anything more about this?

I heard the same thing, and also that when the comic died, Lewis’ popularity in France plumetted.

The godlike status of Lewis in France is mostly U.S. myth. So is the beret wearing/striped shirt/baguette under the arm stereotype. Sadly, the French affection for body odour is true for some. Back to Lewis. True, he received the French Legion of Honour, but so did many other Statesians including the equally vapid Sharon Stone.

In his defence, both Jim Carrey and Robin Williams, whom I understand are very popular, owe him a debt. He also was way ahead of the curve in his philantropic endeavours.

Genius or buffoon. That’s it? Nothing inbetween?

Definitely not genius. I’d reserve that for, say, Buster Keaton. But I can’t simply say buffoon either. I saw Nutty Professor a while ago, and I thought some of what he did was funny. I find some of his bits with Dean Martin funny, too.

As for the Labor Day telethon – Every year it comes and goes without hardly a nod from me, and I’m surprised that it’s considered a big event. Naturally the money raised is a good thing, but is it really “event television” like… What is an event nowadays? The Super Bowl? The World Series? The Oscars? Sorry for the digression.

On a scale of 1 to 10, 1 being buffoon and 10 being genius, I’d give ol’ Jer a 5.

“In his defence, both Jim Carrey and Robin Williams, whom I understand are very popular, owe him a debt.”

—I’d say that’s more of a prosecution arguement . . .

I’d vote for buffoon. He’s just so annoying. I can’t listen to him for any time at all without wondering what people see in him.

I think it’s more for what a previous generation saw in Jerry Lewis.
Maybe you have to use the phrase “You hadda be there” to describe what at one time was considered funny.
The fact that much of Lewis’ humor does not translate well today causes me to believe he should not be considered a genius.
Example: Buffalogical offered Keaton as a genius. Keaton is still funny in routines performed 80 or more years ago. Because his humor has survived this long suggests he’ll survive a lot longer. This standard implies that Keaton was a genius.

The telethon.
Is the thought of the upcoming telethon the reason you’re thinking of Jerry Lewis?
Once popular personalities sometime end up in institutional spots. The institutional spot reminds us of the personality of yesteryear and causes us to compare that personality with today’s flavor of the month.

Forgotten icons of the past might include Arthur Godfrey.

Was that an intentional typo on my name? Actually, it’s much better, though perhaps not accurate.

In defense of Jerry (soft of):
One of the tragedies of growing old in the public eye is that people see you as you are now, as opposed to as you were in your prime. We never got to see James Dean turn into a fat, old Marlon Brando, for example. I believe the same thing can be said for Jerry. I once saw some old TV footage of Jerry and Dean during their prime, and I found them to be quite funny. In particular, I saw some footage of Jerry and Dean onstage with Hope and Crosby, and J&D were totally out of control. They ran around like lunatics, and Crosby finally walked off of the stage in frustration. J&D had stolen the show.

As for Jerry’s films, I always thought he was a fine film maker. “The Nutty Professor” is generally regarded as his masterpiece, and while not a laugh-out-loud film, has some great things in it. It has very vibrant colors throughout, and some subtle (Jerry Lewis, subtle?), under-stated gags. For example, after the lab explosion at the beginning of the film, Jerry walks into the deans office and sits down in a chair, and sinks WAY down into the chair. Worried about the soot on his clothes, he stands up and puts a magazine in the chair to sit on. When he sits on the magazine in the chair, he doesn’t sink into the chair anymore, but instead sits way up high in the chair, as if that flimsy magazine is supporting his weight now. Not a laugh-out-loud gag, but a subtle what-the-hell-was-he-thinking gag. He went to a lot of elaborate set ups and spent a lot of dough, somethimes out of his own pocket, for the gags in his movies. He constructed a huge set with a staircase for one movie (I can’t recall the name - might be Cinderfella), that at the time was one of the biggest sets ever built. I think he is also credited with inventing the use of video playback on his sets, so he could see what he had just filmed rather than have to wait for the film to be developed later. I also heard that the studio he worked for demanded a picture from him before he could shoot another movie, so he filmed “The Bellboy” without aid of a script. He just got some folks together and improvised an entire movie.

Now, is he a genius or a buffoon? Ask Jerry, and he will say genius. Catch him on a talk show, and he comes off a lot like Buddy Love - arrogant, conceited, full of himself and sometimes downright mean. Its as if playing Buddy Love created a permanent schism in his personality (his children have said that during the filming of “Professor” he would come home, still in the Love costume and character, and would scare the hell out of them). You can even see it on the telethons - all serious and singing old show tunes and stuff, and every once in a while, as if Kelps formula is wearing off, the Kid breaks out for a second or two, only to be squashed back down into his psyche by Love. Also, while he made a couple of good films after “Professor”, his downhill slide began soon after, and he never recaptured his former glory (remember his return to directing, “Hardly Working”?)

For me, I will tepidly say genius, but only as a film maker. I think at times he did have flashes of brilliance behind the camera. As a comedian, I don’t want to brand him a buffoon, but I think some of the stage work he and Dean did (not counting the movies, which ARE sappy), was pretty funny stuff. Dean did not like to rehearse, and like I said above, some of their television stuff was just out out of control. I do think that seeing him as he his now dilutes his previous work and makes him easy to dismiss. But like other people who have been labled genius, like Charlie Chaplin, Brian Wilson and Alfred Hitchcock, I find Jerry to be a fascinating case study.

Can you expand on this a liitle bit? I’ve never seen it, and can’t tell which way it fits in your (very persuasive, btw) argument.

I know little of his directing skill, and can’t recall any of his directed films right now. I do know the Anamaniac’s satiric “Hearts of Twilight” episode with him as an out-of-control director demanding take after take and going far over budget. Is this an accurate portrayal (and I still don’t get most of the jokes in that episode).

The giant staircase stageset was for “The Ladies Man,” where Jerry takes refuge in a home for women when he’s dumped by his girlfriend and swears off women forever. That film, along with “The Bellboy,” and his other solo stuff DO have some great sight gags in them (Cinderfella also has Ed Wynn as the fairy Godfather). He also did a very good job in “The King of Comedy.” Its his early stuff with Martin that I can’t abide.

Vanity Fair had a good profile of him several years ago, and the author made the point about him having a dual personality.

If you get a chance, watch the “Inside the Actor’s Studio” interview with him. I learned many things, and he said one thing that I found profound - and if you’ve seen “Funny Bones” you’ll understand it better. I forget the first question, but his answer is along the lines of “I need the audience reaction to be funny.” Then he’s asked about the line between comedy and drama. His response is “There is no line. Nothing is more tragic than what I just said. I need you people to be alive

As a film maker he is highly regarded. He wrote a book that is used as the text at USC or UCLA. His pictures were on time and under budget (so screech-owl that is a joke). His humor can be a bit much, especially the Kid. But that’s his schtick. Might as well get on Steven Wright’s case for being so laconic. And it probably is a passing of time thing - we are unfamiliar with his early work, we just see the fat Marlon Brando telethon guy.

And I just shot my 1,000th post load on Jerry Lewis.

http://www.jerrylewiscomedy.com/films_director.htm
has a list of the films Jerry had directed.

IMHO, “Hardly Working” just falls flat. Not only is it not up to snuff with his earlier work, but you get a middle-aged-plus Jerry trying to be the Kid again. If you ever see it, Jerry plays an out of work circus clown, but wears big ass gold rings and jewelry throughout the movie. It’s like he is trying to be the Kid again, but Buddy Love can’t help peeking through. I think shortly after “Professor” Jerry just got way out of touch, and “Hardly Working” shows that even after a hiatus, he could not find his way back. He attempted one more feature film after that and called it quits as a director.

I wouldn’t characterize him as a tyrant on the set, but as a perfectionist who would do take after take to get what he wanted.

I HATE Jerry Lewis. I mean I absolutely loathe the man.

Screech-owl: Paul Rugg, who wrote a ton of the classic Animaniacs episodes, was heavily influenced by Lewis and even plays the part of “Mr. Director.” “Hearts of Twilight” parodies F.F. Coppola’s work more than Lewis, though - Apocalypse Now is infamous for the out-of-control budget and shooting schedule, and even the outtake where Brando accidentally swallows a bug. The only reference to Lewis work is the title of the movie, “The Wretched Clown,” based on Lewis’s unreleased The Day the Clown Cried.

I’ve not seen much of Lewis’s work (I can’t abide him), but I have seen him playing music on a typewriter that Rugg used for Yakko in “Temporary Insanity.” Lewis can link to the classic Termite Terrace days, in a way - Frank Tashlin directed him in a couple of movies, like The Geisha Boy.

I know Cecil addressed the French issue, but I’m too lazy to look for it. I have the vapors…

When I was younger I thought he was the most brilliant comic in the world. Now that I am a bit older I realize I was the dumbest kid in the world.

  1. Ma and Pa Kettle Do One Damned Thing or Another,
  2. Francis the Talking Mule,
  3. Jerry Lewis,
  4. Poor old Ernest…

In that order, from the bottom of the heap