Yes and, surprise surprise, not only are you advocating (yet another) anti-Jewish witch hunt with no evidence at all, you’re using an argument that aims at using cuetsy semantic games to try to avoid what it’s saying by calling it something else. And, naturally, your argument ignores that your own cite says that not only is your ‘logic’ vacuous to the point where you witch hunt, but if you actually brought it further than an internet smear campaign, it would probably result in you having to pay the legal fees of those (dastardly) Jews who you want to sue. Just like somehow you read a claim of limited cultural factors that led to limited overrepresented in limited fields as innate superiority across absolutely all fields (due to Jewish Supremacism, naturally).
Bonus points, naturally, for your continued use of Turnspeak. You don’t have any evidence of a dastardly Jewish cabal, but make those bastards deny it (constantly). What, someone else is pointing out that your argument is so full of holes it wouldn’t hold a thimble full of water?
Accuse them of being paranoid and make them deny it!
Your oh-so-serious disapproval of Johnson’s smear tactics would be more convincing if they weren’t, literally, the only thing that your argument is based on.
Actually, that’d be you again Spoke. I know, it’s horrible, your own words keep misrepresenting what you really meant to say.
[
](Cabal Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster)
Are you, in fact, alleging that there is a group of persons secretly united in a plot to keep Jews out of Hollywood? Yes, unless of course you’re claiming that they don’t make a secret of it and they’ve admitted to it (you’re not claiming that, are you?)
Oh oh oh, is your cutesy-semantic-game that you’re not necessarily alleging a plot, it might just be that those Jews just inherently and without a conscious plot just discriminate against gentiles in order to help Jews and just kind of end up somehow controlling all of the publicly held companies’ boards of directors to get even more Jews into positions of power. Because then you might have a point. Then you wouldn’t be alleging a Jewish cabal, just a Jewish spontaneous-conspiracy-against-gentiles.
Unless, of course, your own words are again acting against you (perhaps-conspiring-but-we-can’t-be-sure).
The fact that there is such “sound and fury” with no evidence at all to back up the innuendo-campaign, and that campaign has not been modified, altered, ameliorated (let alone retracted) by the person advancing it despite it having no supporting evidence at all and quite a bit of opposing evidence does signify something about the argument itself.