Walter Reed administration doesn’t get to pick who comes to entertain the troops. That’s done across the river in that big five-sided building. Walter Reed administration just gets to deal with all the arrangements for whoever they are told will be coming and when.
I’m not Walter Reed administration, but I’m closely enough related to it to be able to assure you that that’s the way it works. I have no details about this specific case, however.
Baez was established before Dylan, but they toured together, and they were lovers, back in '64 or so. Baez was noted for doing Dylan songs, many of which never made it to an album. Take a listen to Bootleg 5, the '64 Carnegie Hall Concert.
If the Byrds got back together, would you be surprised at them doing Dylan covers also?
While he’s not a huge fan of the war, since Henry Rollins is an avid “supporter of the troops”, I’m in wait and see mode over this question.
I’m a bit confused as to why you used that as a response to my post, as I said nothing about politics. I was simply demonstrating that the military wasn’t rejecting her because her music wasn’t enjoyed by those in attendance. I’m not a big Baez fan, but I’ll listen to her worst song twenty times over hearing Newton singing “Danke Schoen.”
Also, tomndebb, Walter Reed is a U.S. Army hospital. The VA does not have any management or oversight of the place, with the possible exception of managing benefits for individual veterans who use the facility. They certainly don’t handle entertainment there.
Let’s be fair; you’re hearing a snippet of what was said and you’re hearing it, at best, second hand. Ever play the old telephone game in school?
“She won’t fit” originally may well have been more along the lines of “Well, we’re looking for some acts the guys will like, and we don’t think Ms. Baez really fits that. Do you know if the Black Eyed Peas are available?” That makes just as much sense. As others have pointed out, today’s GIs don’t know who Joan Baez is, or, if they do, would rather have OutKast. (So would I.)
I’m not saying I know this exclusion wasn’t political, but the truth is that
A) We DON’T know for sure either way,
B) When it comes to any governmental organization, you’re always better off betting on incompetence and administrative confusion, rather than intent, and
C) The article’s headline is deliberately inflammatory and misleading.
Well, I really have no problem imagining that it was some 60 year old colonel–who never got over that time Joan Baez spit on him and called him a babykiller at the airport when he was new Lieutenant returning home from his first tour in Vietnam after seeing his best friend’s brains blown out during that VC dawn ambush–was the one who made the decision that Joan Baez and her kind weren’t welcome.
I think the point being made is that there are a subset of Vietnam-era military officers who consider themselves to have a standing grudge against anyone even vaguely folksy from the 60s, regardless of the reality of the situation then and now.
I only know one of those kinda guys personally, but hell, it’s not any less plausible than any of the other random theories floating around this thread.
Why this hasn’t stalled out on a “too many damn conflicting stories, let’s wait for something solid” is anyone’s guess.