The question in the OP doesn’t make any sense. If they already make inflatable boats, what do they need a prototype for? Why can’t they just keep on making their old inflatable boats?
This is a good point, and whether you address the interviewer about this (ie, point out the curious use of the word “prototype”) or not is an interesting dilemma? Would the rest of you?
(It’s actually similar to a situation where you notice that the original classified ad/job posting has a typo in it. Do you say something?)
My answer: I probably would, in both cases, but tactfully, of course. Especially for the question above as opposed to my scenario, because it might buy me a couple seconds to try to figure out what the OP is designed to accomplish (while they’re busy clarifying the original question).
I’m particularly interested in what a recruiter or office administrator would think.
As to Soulfrost’s original baseball question, I would think my answer would be “Mine. At least to me.” (Followed by standard tripe about how it IS a team sport, blahblah…)
Why not outsource the design and construction of the prototype…the first guy that arrives on your island in an inflatable dinghy has proved he has the best product…Microsoft then buy his idea, market it as their own and sit back and watch 95% of the population buy the damn thing only to see it pop leaks every other day and sink.
That’s because you have cunningly made lots of tiny little holes in it so everyone has to constantly upgrade with, ahem, patches. Lifeboat 2.0, with Portholes XP.
I think I would point out that prototyping is not an appropriate design methodology for an object that is expected to traverse bodies of deep water. Who the hell wants to do the mid Pacific QA on Lifesaver V1.0.
The correct answer for “What are your weaknesses?” is “I make the other staff look bad.” For the paranoid amongst us it is “All the other staff hate me because I’m so popular.”
Okay, I would make the boat round, semi-translucent and have weighted streamers hanging off the bottom. The reason is that it would then look like a jellyfish, and sharks don’t eat jellyfish. <:D
…
Of course, after looking it up I see that sea turtles and sunfish both do eat jellyfish, and both of them are generally considered non-violent… to people.
But both of them grow as big as a subcompact car, and if you could ask a jellyfish, I rather doubt that it would say they were non-violent… but the interviewer may have just read it in a trendy management book last month and know nothing of the seas. So I’ll place my bet on the jellyfish-boat answer.
~
I tend to be impatient. If other workers are holding my back, I usually offer to help them out. I’m also a perfectionist, I am constantly thinking of ways to improve the product I am working on.
There’s a book on this now, How Would You Move Mount Fuji, by William Poundstone, copyright 2003. Maybe he’s a Doper and wrote it after reading/posting this thread. Anyway you can go to the library and check it out. It’s fairly interesting.