[QUOTE=elucidator]
Uh-oh, he’s going to DefCon 15! This could escalate into a spat.
[/QUOTE]
Maybe even a tiff!
[QUOTE=if6was9]
I have no problem at all with BG posts. He scours the web looking for the latest atrocities. And these are atrocities! They’re no blow jobs and “I did not have sex with that woman.” These involve thousands of American lives, and 100’s of thousands of Iraqi lives, and the administration wiping their ass with the constitution.
I haven’t seen the GD snipes, but if John Mace has a problem with BG’s posts, maybe John should like change the Pub party. Or offer a factual rebuttal. Or open his fucking eyes. Instead of spouting that days talking points. You know, put up or shut up.
This crap isn’t working and the Dems and the vast majority of the people see that.
[/QUOTE]
With all due respect, you’re an idiot.
[QUOTE=John Mace]
With all due respect, you’re an idiot.
[/QUOTE]
I don’t know you from Adam. Except that you’re a mod. Have never noticed any of you posts.
But I’ve noticed Brian’s. And inevitably, his posts result in bringing out all the Pub apologists, harping on some miniscule debate point, instead of the original issue.
Have you done anything to stop this? Or do you just sit back and let the mouths speak for you?
Nice insightful post, btw. :dubious:
[QUOTE=if6was9]
I don’t know you from Adam. Except that you’re a mod.
[/quote]
Nope.
You should read the thread and understand what it’s about. Your earlier post had nothing to do with what’s being discussed here.
[QUOTE=Jackmannii]
Wouldn’t that be a “snippier snipe”?
And presumably such a retort would be doled out by a snipy snip, though I have no firm opinion on the subject at this time.
[/QUOTE]
please repost when you have a firm opinion. 
[QUOTE=silenus]
Maybe even a tiff!
[/QUOTE]
You’re getting a little ahead of yourself. Remember:
.
.
.
DEFCON 15: contretemps
DEFCON 14: spat
DEFCON 13: quarrel
THEN
DEFCON 12: tiff
DEFCON 11: row
DEFCON 10: squabble
.
.
.
Okay that’s it I’m writing a country song called “Defcon 16: You keep the cat, I get the car.”
- Senator Fred Thompson
[QUOTE=John Mace]
Nope.
[/QUOTE]
My bad there. Thought you were a mod.
So you reason that Congress is at fault. Bush started it, continued it, ad nauseum, but it is Congress’ fault for not stopping it. Elsewise they should suck dick and give Bush what he wants.
That’s a position…
[QUOTE=An Gadai]
Okay that’s it I’m writing a country song called “Defcon 16: You keep the cat, I get the car.”
[/QUOTE]
Oh, I got the truck, she keeps the pussy
I got the better part of that deal…
The Dem congress that has been in less than a year is at fault. Not the Pub congress that enabled this crap for 6 years.
[QUOTE=if6was9]
So you reason that Congress is at fault. Bush started it, continued it, ad nauseum, but it is Congress’ fault for not stopping it. Elsewise they should suck dick and give Bush what he wants.
That’s a position…
[/QUOTE]
Dude, put the bong down and read this thread. You are making no sense.
[QUOTE=if6was9]
I have no problem at all with BG posts. He scours the web looking for the latest atrocities. And these are atrocities! They’re no blow jobs and “I did not have sex with that woman.” These involve thousands of American lives, and 100’s of thousands of Iraqi lives, and the administration wiping their ass with the constitution.
[/QUOTE]
Oh my God you’re right! Won’t somebody please think of the children! :rolleyes:
[QUOTE=if6was9]
I don’t know you from Adam. Except that you’re a mod. Have never noticed any of you posts.
But I’ve noticed Brian’s. And inevitably, his posts result in bringing out all the Pub apologists, harping on some miniscule debate point, instead of the original issue.
Have you done anything to stop this? Or do you just sit back and let the mouths speak for you?
Nice insightful post, btw. :dubious:
[/QUOTE]
With all due and all that…I think you mean well, but going off-topic for a bit, what exact type of weed are you smoking and where can I can get some?
Much obliged.
Carry on…
Jimson
[QUOTE=if6was9]
The Dem congress that has been in less than a year is at fault. Not the Pub congress that enabled this crap for 6 years.
[/QUOTE]
Well, John called it. You’re an idiot. He wasn’t playing the blame game, just stating a fact. If the congress is too chicken shit to actually take away George’s war powers, cutting the funding is fucking over the troops.
And just to re-iterate: I did not just say Republicans good, Dems bad. Read it again if you don’t believe me.
[QUOTE=John Mace]
Dude, put the bong down and read this thread. You are making no sense.
[/QUOTE]
Again! Platitudes. Are you going to offer any substance? Or just continue to take pot shots? Talking points.
[QUOTE=RedFury]
With all due and all that…I think you mean well, but going off-topic for a bit, what exact type of weed are you smoking and where can I can get some?
Much obliged.
Carry on…
[/QUOTE]
Fuck you too. I don’t smoke weed.
[QUOTE=elucidator]
Jimson
[/QUOTE]
Gracias. But old-timer that I am, does that have anything to do with Loco-weed? Tried some in Boca years ago, and I’d rather not repeat the experience, if that’s all right by you. Scariest pot ever.
[QUOTE=CarnalK]
Well, John called it. You’re an idiot. He wasn’t playing the blame game, just stating a fact. If the congress is too chicken shit to actually take away George’s war powers, cutting the funding is fucking over the troops.
And just to re-iterate: I did not just say Republicans good, Dems bad. Read it again if you don’t believe me.
[/QUOTE]
How the fuck am I an idiot?
To look at this thread like a GD thread…
Is proposed that John Mace should just Pit BG. Someone thinks JM is pussyfooting around in GD and should just let loose and Pit him.
I like BG. Agree with him 90% of the time.
Granted, I’m stretching, looking at this thread as a free invitation for JM to wail on BG. So I quickly sided with BG. I don’t know JM, so I take the OP’s word that he has a problem with BG.
You have a problem with BG, then you have a problem with me. Simple as that.
And all I get in response is “lay off the bong, dude.”