Sorry for posting this on Shabbes, but I have the time to post now, and read your answers later…
I was wondering about the practice of Jubilee, or a special Sabbatical year, in modern Israel. When reading in the Hebrew Bible about the Sabbatical years and the Jubilee years, I always thought that the Sabbatical years made sense from a purely utilitarian viewpoint, too: with the ancient knowledge of agriculture, a period of dormancy to replenish the soil was necessary for continued fertility. (The middle Ages used the three-plot-method similar to this without religious reasons).
But the Jubilee year concept goes far beyond that: not only do the fields lie fallow, but all debts are cancelled, slaves set free and so on. It’s truely a wonderful illustration of the idea of Shabbes as a glimpse of the world God wants humans to have, a better one. a liberating idea.
But I wondered how this worked on a practical scale in a real. property-based society - Israel had kings and cities and social structures, not communes like modern-day Kibbuzim.
The wikipedia Article makes it sound as if not only the counting itself is disputed - the 49th or the 50th year? - but also whether it actually did ever happen or was maybe added after the time.
The article on the Sabbatyears notes that they are obeyed by modern Israel (and contrary to the humorus story by Ephraim Kishon I read years ago), but that the Jubilee was not observed. The reason given
sounds like a thin pretext to weasel out of it to me.
So, if modern Israel is observing Shmita, shouldn’t they also observe Yovel? Shouldn’t they find a way to decide - as they probably had to do with a bunch of other things from tradition when they were setting up a real working country again after the diaspora - on the counting? Is the real reason for the non-observance that cancelling all debts would be impossible to do in a modern state that trades with other non-jewish nations? Though apparently they are provisions in the codes for that, with the debt getting smaller the closer Jubilee approaches. Was it the whole palestinian problem, of giving land back to them, that prevented it?
I think it sounds like a wonderful idea; I can guess that people initially would balk at it being impossible to overturn a big part of the foundation of modern society with property rights; but shouldn’t it be tried out nevertheless?
After all, the Israelis managed to make Kibbuzim work, after the examples with forced communes in the Soviet Union were failures, and showed everybody that idealism and belief in the human nature isn’t only money-grubbing aren’t wishful thinking only.
What do the experts on Hebrew Bible, on Jewish law say and think? Could it work today? Should it? Why not? Will it come a bit later, once the problems have been solved?