I’m not seeing how any resulting deaths can be laid at the feet of the employees. Surely there’s a well paid staffing admin somewhere in this organization. Isn’t that where responsibility for any resulting disasters truly belongs?
“You can quit at will; here’s how much we’ll pay.”
“If you pay me more, I’ll give six months’ notice.”
”An intriguing proposition! Well, thanks; but no.”
Hospitals transport patients all the time to other hospitals due to shortages or specialized care. It’s not like a surgeon is walking out in the middle of an operation.
It could be actionable in certain circumstances. It’s not an area I’m very familiar with, but I’m talking about what ThedaCare could have alleged. I think it’s actionable if a company, for example, contacted an entire crucial unit staff of a competitor and offered them jobs at higher than market rates in order to damage the competitor. And the company doing that could potentially be enjoined from actually employing the employees in question if they engaged in unlawful practices to hire them.
I agree that the employees are caught in the middle, which is a reflection of inequity built into the system.
Key words there being “in order to damage the competitor”. If they did it just because they, themselves, needed more skilled personnel, then that’s just fine. And it’s both very unlikely that it was done deliberately to damage ThedaCare, and even if true, very difficult to prove.
As was pointed out upthread this was fast-tracked by the judge. I would expect some kind of legal come-to-Jesus-meeting with the plaintiff’s lawyers tomorrow.
The employees are not held in forced servitude. The employees are not entrapped. They can quit. They can go to work for any other hospital. They can move. Nor has the judge made a final decision.
There there is this: What is the main definition of slavery?
slavery, condition in which one human being was owned by another . A slave was considered by law as property, or chattel, and was deprived of most of the rights ordinarily held by free persons.
and this:
slavery , condition in which one [human being](Human being | Britannica) was owned by another. A slave was considered by law as property, or chattel, and was deprived of most of the rights ordinarily held by free persons.
The hyberbolic of comparing anything to slavery weakens the real evil of slavery.
A mod Nudging: You’ve made your point on this, please ensure we have no more posts about the meaning of the word slave. That would be for a new topic if you wish to continue it. I’ll add a note not to reply to your post either for others.
This is just a guidance, not a warning. Nothing on your permanent record of course.
According to the article, the injunction does not have an expiration date but the judge scheduled a hearing for 10:00 this morning. I would be shocked if he did not revisit the injunction based on what’s presented at that hearing.
Over the weekend I chatted a bit with my daughter about this case. She’s been involved in discussions on nursing boards, where the topic is blowing up.
She tells me ThedaCare is going to be harmed in the long run by this action. Nurses are going to shy away from accepting employment with a hospital that takes actions like they have. She predicts at least a small exodus from ThedaCare.
As to her own thoughts, if she were told she couldn’t accept a job offer she would take a sabbatical from working for awhile. She’s her dads daughter!
Well technically its feudalism. Two lords are quarreling over one poaching their serfs. What you think you can just up sticks from Sun Valley and go work for lord Ascension? That would be very inconvenient to Lord Thetacare, we are in the middle of a staffing crisis due to the recent plague, I will appeal to the king!